• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

White Americans Dying Faster Than They're Being Born

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
No surprise. White liberal women have been flushing their kids down the toilet under the guise of abortion for years. We have a critical mass of flushers (abortion). Another 20 years they will be on the endangered species list.
 
Wait! Germans aren't white? ok great! I'm German (both sets of grandparents came over right before or right after WWII). So my gets get to take advantage of AA for college and jobs!?

I am as german as the day is long and I don't see how I am anything but white.
 
No surprise. White liberal women have been flushing their kids down the toilet under the guise of abortion for years. We have a critical mass of flushers (abortion). Another 20 years they will be on the endangered species list.

Well there's that, plus white women have a tendency to be on birth control their entire (reproductive) lives.
 
welfare11.png


😕

:lol: Not to mention the only legitimate way to make a comparison is to show the percent of each race that is on welfare.

Comparing the amount of 99999999 whites on welfare to 99999 blacks/hispanics on welfare is... well... hilarious. But I guess liberals don't understand what fairness is. They just count everything up without the whole mathematical equations factored in.
 
:lol: Not to mention the only legitimate way to make a comparison is to show the percent of each race that is on welfare.

Comparing the amount of 99999999 whites on welfare to 99999 blacks/hispanics on welfare is... well... hilarious. But I guess liberals don't understand what fairness is. They just count everything up without the whole mathematical equations factored in.

Math is racist.
 
:lol: Not to mention the only legitimate way to make a comparison is to show the percent of each race that is on welfare.

Comparing the amount of 99999999 whites on welfare to 99999 blacks/hispanics on welfare is... well... hilarious. But I guess liberals don't understand what fairness is. They just count everything up without the whole mathematical equations factored in.

And even by their unfair comparison they still lose. Its doubly funny.

You guys really missed the point of all that, huh.

I think the point is you don't actually read the quotes you are posting. If you post quote from a guy saying Swedes are of dark complexion... maybe you should rethink posting it.
 
I think the point is you don't actually read the quotes you are posting. If you post quote from a guy saying Swedes are of dark complexion... maybe you should rethink posting it.

The point is that standards of whiteness have changed over time, as evidenced by direct quotation from a prominent historical figure. This isn't brain surgery.

As for advising someone to think before posting, maybe you should take your own advice.
 
:lol: Not to mention the only legitimate way to make a comparison is to show the percent of each race that is on welfare.



The poverty rates for White Americans are the second-lowest of any racial group, with 10.8% of white individuals living below the poverty line, 3% lower than the national average.[42]



However, due to Whites' majority status, 48% of Americans living in poverty are white.[43]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_American#Income_and_educational_attainment

How does the math look?
 
The point is that standards of whiteness have changed over time, as evidenced by direct quotation from a prominent historical figure. This isn't brain surgery.

As for advising someone to think before posting, maybe you should take your own advice.

"white" is a socially determined category but most "whites" have an ethnic category like English, Polish, Italian, etc. For awhile Italians weren't considered white while they were immigrants. So I think I agree.

All the latest social trends like waiting to have kids, acceptance of LGBT lifestyles, etc. are plunging birth rates down for "whites." They sacrifice family for career to get ahead, but if they have no family legacy will they be "winning" economically in 50-100 years? If you have to sacrifice either family or career you were never privileged/rich to begin with.

Privilege is usually passed down along family lines and that has been breaking down apparently. I think the Baby Boomers failed to pass on their privilege/wealth/knowledge to their kids and the kids sacrificed family to match their parents career success/expectations and in just one more generation "white" isn't going to be the dominant culture anymore.
 
The point is that standards of whiteness have changed over time, as evidenced by direct quotation from a prominent historical figure. This isn't brain surgery.

As for advising someone to think before posting, maybe you should take your own advice.

Anyone claiming that Swedes have dark skin is just plain and simple wrong. Its like claiming that the Atlantic Ocean is dry.


48% of people in poverty are white. Once again majority not found :colbert:

Although the specific claim was related to welfare not poverty. In which he was even more wrong as white people are not even a plurality of those on welfare.
 
Anyone claiming that Swedes have dark skin is just plain and simple wrong. Its like claiming that the Atlantic Ocean is dry.

lol, so now you know who was considered white in the 1700's better than someone who lived in the 1700's. THEY WERE JUST WRONG is a really compelling counter-argument though.

Maybe you should think before you post.
 
There are like 6 times more white people than black. So lets just say there are a lot of losers sucking on the government Teat. So what is the Hispanic/Mexican percentage? 12%.

The statistics say about the same percentage of people on welfare are white or black based on just the total number of people on welfare.

I think they should include people on disability. Many people were out of work so they applied for disability. So maybe they are not counted in statistics.

This whole count may be misleading. A lot of people get different kinds of welfare. Some women just get like SSI which is kind of like foodstamps for the child. Usually this is just some chicken feed of cash to pay for formula or whatever. Some families get SSI or ss for every child.

They should have given some real statistics. Take total population, take welfare totals and computer the statistics as welfare recipients per 1,000 people. That way you can compare apples to apples.

Wonder how many welfare people are not US Citizens or legal residents?
 
Last edited:
38.8% of 4.1% ~ 1%

Yea.

Most whites, even if they quality for welfare, won't take it though. So lower class whites are at a disadvantage. And upper class whites sacrifice family life for career life, they will have zero legacy to pass on. Their wealth will go to charities, or something.

Any data to back up bolded?
 
Back
Top