- Dec 12, 2000
- 25,564
- 10,242
- 136
The NLRB “investigates and adjudicates complaints about unfair labor practices. It stores reams of potentially sensitive data, from confidential information about employees who want to form unions to proprietary business information.” Gee, I can think of a few billionaires who’d pay handsomely for this data.
Also, after DOGE accessed sensitive data, they removed intrusion detection and monitoring tools. Nearly immediately afterwards, NLRB staffers “started detecting suspicious log-in attempts from an IP address in Russia”.
Oh yeah, about that whistleblower: “…his attempts to raise concerns internally within the NLRB preceded someone "physically taping a threatening note" to his door that included sensitive personal information and overhead photos of him walking his dog that appeared to be taken with a drone.”
The Stasi are watching you.
Are DOGE’s bad boys enabling state-sponsored hacking on purpose, or is this just a consequence of their slash and burn approach to IT?? I guess in someways you could argue DOGE *is* a state-sponsored hack.
Also, after DOGE accessed sensitive data, they removed intrusion detection and monitoring tools. Nearly immediately afterwards, NLRB staffers “started detecting suspicious log-in attempts from an IP address in Russia”.
Oh yeah, about that whistleblower: “…his attempts to raise concerns internally within the NLRB preceded someone "physically taping a threatening note" to his door that included sensitive personal information and overhead photos of him walking his dog that appeared to be taken with a drone.”
The Stasi are watching you.
Are DOGE’s bad boys enabling state-sponsored hacking on purpose, or is this just a consequence of their slash and burn approach to IT?? I guess in someways you could argue DOGE *is* a state-sponsored hack.