• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

which would be a better cpu a Pentium N3700 or a Celeron N3150?

BirdDad

Golden Member
they both dissipate the same amount of Watts and seem almost the same.
They both have AES-NI

I plan to have 150Mbps cable connection real soon and want to be ready for it. So Pentium or Celeron? which do I need? It will be for openVPN with PIA on a pfSense box.
 
Last edited:
they are both quad core and seem about the same except for the Pentium's higher burst clock speed.
Thanks
 
the graphics don't interest me. What interests me is the computational abilities of the chips, which one is better for encrypting/decrypting a connection on the fly?
AES256,SHA256, and RSA4096?
 
They are both Braswell chips with identical capabilities as far as I can see.

The Pentium should be faster with it's much higher burst frequency of 2.4Ghz.

You never know, you might need the IGP at some point.
 
The biggest difference I see between the two is the amount of excecution units in the igp (12 vs 16). The extra 300 MHz will probably amount to somewhere between 10-16% performance difference.

If the price difference is significant, go with the Celeron.
 
Because Braswell boards are not yet widely deployed, I suspect you will not find direct, authoritative guidance. However the Silvermont architecture has been around a while and Braswell is almost the same CPU architecture with a process shrink. Go nuts with Google searching for PFSense and J1800, for example, to get a sense of what to expect. I read some of the posts to suggest that a J1800 is generally good for 1 GbE WAN speeds so I would be comfortable with a Celeron N3000 (the really slow dual core you did not ask about) for your 0.15 GbE WAN connection. Iptables, however branded, is what PFSense is built around and it is a notoriously non CPU intensive kernel feature. It might not hurt to repost the question on a dedicated PFSense forum for greater certainty.

I do not like the motherboard you did not specify because it either features an onboard Realtek NIC or is ungodly expensive with onboard Intel NIC's and a power sucking BMC (Supermicro). Double check to verify that the onboard NIC is supported in PFSense as this has sometimes been a problem in the past. BSD and it's derivative distributions generally value Intel NIC's highly. Your unspecified motherboard may feature only a single PCIe slot. Consider a, perhaps used, Intel PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapter.

Do not get overexcited by TDP specifications. Intel shares a chassis thermal solution between several processors so they throw a bunch of different processors into an identical TDP rating. To date, I have not found a solid, apples to apples comparison of power requirements for different Braswell processors.
 
Back
Top