JTsyo
Lifer
- Nov 18, 2007
- 12,038
- 1,135
- 126
ive never understood this view. why would we suddenly be back in the stone age just because all existing technology ceases to operate? we still know how to make new ones, right? and EMP wont affect anything new we make.
id take my chances in the zombie thing over them all. although i do enjoy playing post-apocalyptic games, so world-wide nuclear war survival would be ok too![]()
ive never understood this view. why would we suddenly be back in the stone age just because all existing technology ceases to operate? we still know how to make new ones, right? and EMP wont affect anything new we make.
id take my chances in the zombie thing over them all. although i do enjoy playing post-apocalyptic games, so world-wide nuclear war survival would be ok too![]()
Which worldwide catastrophic event would you least prefer not to experience?
It reads like you are asking me which worldwide catastrophic event would I prefer to experience. Kind of double negativeish. So my answer is none.
That is exactly what I'm asking. If one catastrophic event will occur, which event would you prefer.
By reading the thread, I can tell many people didn't understand my question.
If Jesus did come down for final judgement, I would shit my pants.
"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a roar and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up."
In other words, I don't want to be there when the slate of the universe is wiped clean by God.
