All of them have dual-head, but only certain types of Ti4200's/4600's have dual-head. Not all of them do.Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
which one is the fastest and can all of them do dual monitors?
free huh? niiice.Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
I have an extended warranty through compusa that my card will be gettin replaced through....
these are the likely replacements for my card that I will be gettin for free.... I would probably drop the $100 to goto the 9700 or 9800 though.... then again, a free card is a mighty good price...
I really need it to do dual monitors at seperate resolutions in XP though....
Originally posted by: AunixM3
free huh? niiice.Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
I have an extended warranty through compusa that my card will be gettin replaced through....
these are the likely replacements for my card that I will be gettin for free.... I would probably drop the $100 to goto the 9700 or 9800 though.... then again, a free card is a mighty good price...
I really need it to do dual monitors at seperate resolutions in XP though....
Well. Considering compusa prolly won't give you a choice, and most likely doesn't carry dual-head Ti4200's and 4600's, I'd suggest going with the 9500, sure thing that way.
~Aunix
I would go for the 9700, personally. It will offer good longevity and is the most powerful of all the cards you have mentioned.Originally posted by: GobadgrsThen its pretty much a no brainer to pay the extra $80 to get the 9700 right? Or would you pay $180 more to get the 9800
Originally posted by: AunixM3
I would go for the 9700, personally. It will offer good longevity and is the most powerful of all the cards you have mentioned.Originally posted by: GobadgrsThen its pretty much a no brainer to pay the extra $80 to get the 9700 right? Or would you pay $180 more to get the 9800
The 9700 can be softmodded (see my post stickied at the top of this forum to get that) to the 9800. So no point wasting $100 on something you already "have."
~Aunix