Which version of WinAMP is the best or least buggie

[BCskunk]

yeah..just dont use 3

 

[hdeck]

2.8

 

[thomsbrain]

2.91 works fine for me. it's a pity aol owns them now.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

I haven't had a single problem with 3.0.

 

[Linux23]

still using 2.8...lol.

i feel no need to upgrade.

 

[Muse]

Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Hate to cut in on someone elses thread but what's so great about winamp anyway? I dl'd it a few months ago (not sure which version) and just didn't really get what the big deal was. From the way I've hear people rave about it I was expecting it to automaticly play whatever song I wanted to hear while it played with my balls or something. Maybe I'm just missing something.

I started a thread in December 2001 with topic Is Winamp better than MS Media Player?. At the time I too couldn't see what all the fuss was about. But after engaging in that thread, reading it, etc. I decided that Winamp was way better than Media Player. Now, after using Winamp for well over a year, I would never use MS Media Player. I'm using Winamp 2.81.

 

[Muse]

Originally posted by: thomsbrain
2.91 works fine for me. it's a pity aol owns them now.

Yeah, leave it to AOL to screw something up.

 

[jacob0401]

Another vote for 2.81

 

[TheWart]

Originally posted by: jfall
I use 2.91 here, never had a problem

winamp 3 sucks the llama.

 

[slydecix]

qcd here... better sound quality, smaller mem footprint, and more customizable (in terms of skins) than winamp 2.xx

 

[Fritzo]

2.8x. Version 3 is junk.

 

[Angrymarshmello]

2.8x

 

[Tetsuo]

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
640MB is limited? My ass. Winamp 2.91 here, also QCD. Winamp3 blows dead goats. - M4H

no no no, its dead Illama's

Using 2.91 here, id prefer to use 2.81, but im too lazy to go find it