• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which two Windows OSes for dual boot (poll inside)?

RSMemphis

Golden Member
I am currently using 2k and 98 in a dual boot setup, which performs quite nicely. 2k is my main OS, and I use 98 whenever 2k does not run something properly.
I was wondering if I should upgrade one of the two to XP, but it seems like XP does not do much more than 2k, and XP is still less compatible than 98.

BTW, I use freebsd for certain things, but I just don't like unix derivatives for my computer at home. So Linux etc. is not an option in this poll.
 
I think if everything is working, I would leave it alone (unless you already have a copy of XP to put on).
W2K is quite stable after patches, etc. Also, certainly leave Windows 98 alone, especially, like you said,
for apps/games/whatever that won't run on W2K/XP.
 
Just like the previous post says, why bother if everything is working? Is there something in particular in WinXP (feature/task) that you cannot accomplish with your existing OS'?
 
Personally, I dual-boot 98SE/XP Home...Only because I never owned Win 2K. Since you allready have a 2K/98 setup, there is really no reason to upgrade(?) to 98/XP as 2K will pretty much do anything that XP can do, and what it can't (unsupported apps,some games), you have 98 for.
 
Yeah, I got a copy XP professional that I haven't used (got it at Microsoft thingy, it's an academic version)... Thanks for the advice, I think I will leave it as is for now.

Thanks everyone.
 
Back
Top