• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which takes up less room in a landfill?

Status
Not open for further replies.
irrelevant, really. all depends on how well you compress and conserve the material inside each bag, everything else being equal.

which means: are we talking about paper bags or plastic bags? same material for small and large, right?

therefore, I voted for pigs. you should add goats to that option...
 
uh, I would think the bag has nothing to do with the overall area that your total haul of garbage takes. Whether it's one bag with a cubic foot of waste or two small bags each with a half cubic foot of waste, you still have the same amount of waste.
 
Yeah, trash kinda compacts regardless of the super-duper strong construction of its less than a mil thick wall....... There is a reason why we don't put our trash in sturdy metal spheres, now that would be a poor way to pack it down.
 
Using a larger container will result in less material being used - if you've got 10lbs of trash and use one bag versus several smaller bags, you'll send less waste to the landfill.

Geometry of the "spheres" of trash is irrelevant, as everyone said already, due to the compressibility of the material.


 
According to a t.v. show I saw, modern landfills spread the bags out evenly in the landfill and drive over them with a machine that cuts the bags open so that stuff will decompose faster, for whatever thats worth. Any compaction of trash into the bag is probably irrelevant at that point.
 
We take most of the fast-decomposing stuff out for compost.... so ours real trash probably sits there forever 😱
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top