which social networking sites do you actively use?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

?

  • facebook

  • myspace

  • twitter

  • linkedin

  • other

  • none


Results are only viewable after voting.

fulltilt39

Golden Member
Aug 6, 2009
1,323
0
0
Seriously, I fucking don't want anyone to know where I am and what I am doing all the time (this is exactly what Zuckerburg thinks that WE ALL WANT.)

This goes hand in hand with the "I'm kind of a big deal" thread. All of these kids that grew up on IM and such really do think that they are so fucking important, that the most mundane tasks that we have all called "life" for generations, is so suddenly important that everyone must know, all the damn time.

So yeah..it's mostly this attitude of unadulterated self-importance that Facebook not only thrives upon, but promotes, that rubs me the wrong way.

very well put (except for the one word i fixed :)) and exactly the reasons i refused to have it, even though every single person i know has bugged me and ridiculed me at some time for not going along with it.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Dudes, just friend true friends and post your pics / check out their pics... that's essentially its best use. Nobody needs to know what you're doing right now so why is that even a complaint?

I remember when it didn't exist and anytime you wanted to share pics you had to up them to kodakgallery or whatever the other one was and fricken email everyone the link... or worst yet, you had to have their email inputted through their interface. Half the time you wonder if people even cared to see them. Now others can choose themself whether they want to see them.
 
Last edited:

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Dudes, just friend true friends and post your pics / check out their pics... that's essentially its best use. Nobody needs to know what you're doing right now so why is that even a complaint?

I remember when it didn't exist and anytime you wanted to share pics you had to up them to kodakgallery or whatever the other one was and fricken email everyone the link... or worst yet, you had to have their email inputted through their interface. Half the time you wonder if people even cared to see them. Now others can choose themself whether they want to see them.

To anyone who says people have forgotten how to socialize because of these sites, again I say to just friend true friends and it's not even an issue.
Yeah I agree it has its uses. I think that its concept is great and its execution is very good but IMO facebook is going the opposite direction from what I want. There are many who feel the way zinfamous does and I am sympathetic to most of it.

The general rule I take with facebook is I don't post anything at all that I'd not want everybody in my life looking at, from mother to boss to children. I've thought from time to time of just cancelling it but "everyone has it" and it would be weird now. So 99% of my status updates (only a couple/week) are just humorous irrelevancies.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
well, as I mentioned, my issue is not with the typical privacy concerns that people complain about regarding Facebook--the info that you enter, that they use (anonymously, I should add--despite what many of these critics seem to understand) to share with their partners and collect marketing data, but Zuckerburg's insistence that FB should be integrated into your entire life, in such a way that you really can't escape it.

It's his site. It's his perogative to make it more popular and widely used - the more he can get his website's hooks deeply into our lives, the better his long term prospects are. I have no issue with this as I'd do the exact same.

I mentioned watching a movie and having people find you when you want to chill and ignore all that noise. That is what annoys me--when Facebook starts to find you no matter where you are.

Log out when you're not actively using Facebook and it'll be fine. One click solution.

yes, you can to a certain degree choose what you want to use and include, but as I've read from the mouth himself, this is going to be less and less of an option. If he wants FB to grow the way he wants it to, he simply has to remove many of these increased privacy options. There is no getting away from that for FB to grow along its current model.

Again, his perogative, and anyone acting in the best interests of his company would do the same. If users don't like it, they'll vote with their virtual feet. Friendster and Myspace are proof enough that people only have so much tolerance for being annoyed with a website.

That, and again the issue that people have managed to confuse this kind of communication with actual socialization. It absolutely is not the same. People have forgotten how to talk to each other like normal humans, it seems. very sad. :( (not simply the fault of Facebook, of course; but certainly a big contributor)

Uh, no. Of course everyone still knows how to talk to each other - they're not plugging themselves into the Matrix and living life on Facebook in a bodybuilder's body, they're at worst posting to-the-minute updates about inconsequential things via their mobile phone or going to concerts or clubs and snapping hundreds of photos for the sake of showing their Facebook friends that they go out and do interesting things.

Who cares? If that's what they want to spend their time doing, let them. With or without Facebook they'd still be doing mindless garbage. As long as they're happy I don't know why anyone should be concerned.

...and Zuckerberg really is a complete douche. I don't like the guy and I find his interpretation of culture to be both thin and inconsequential. This is the foundation of the product, so I'm just not interested in supporting it. :\

So don't support it. But don't lord your equally inconsequential views over the rest of us.