flexy
Diamond Member
Originally posted by: bap4201
my vote is for the asus, if you are not an enthusiast.
Asus, for its performance, very "mild" overclockability, flaws and problems is way overprized and overhyped.
Originally posted by: bap4201
my vote is for the asus, if you are not an enthusiast.
Originally posted by: Dethfrumbelo
It's crunch time here too. I need to get a mobo sometime this coming week.
DFI > MSI > Gigabyte > ASUS
DFI is too far off, so that's out. MSI would be my 1st choice if it comes out on time. Gigabyte looks solid on NF4, but is way overpriced. ASUS is a little bit cheaper, but apparently is a lousy overclocker with a beta bios.
There is only ONE recent review of the Gigabyte (on tbreak, jan 2nd !) where they say its a good board, but they could NOT overclock the board at all from bios but had to use software tool. Also....in non-sli mode it looks the MSI is a bit faster.
Originally posted by: gixxer
There is a review of the MSi board over at HardOCP.. http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NzE0
And there is a review of the DFI here on Anandtech
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NzE0
Originally posted by: Teknet
I've got an MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI coming in next week. What I liked about the board is the second SATA II controller. Also, both the SiI 3132 SATA II chip & the Marvell 88E8053 GB Ethernet chip are PCI-E x1 parts. All of the other SLI boards on the market are traditional PCI parts for the second SATA controller & GB Ethernet controller. This is probably there are no additional PCI-E slots on the board...although it would have been nice to see one.