I hate to throw a monkey wrench in your 9500pro plans ?. KGB.

I had posted some stuff about the 9600pro doing better against the 9500pro in some of the latest reviews. THG?s 9800XT review and the 5950/5700 Firingsquad review (15 games total) the 9600pro and 9500pro were in a dead heat performance wise.
It?s hard to find newer reviews with the 9500pro but in the
HardOCP 5700U review they had both a 9500pro/9600XT. The 9600XT won 5/8 game benches and looked a little faster overall, but the cards are pretty close with each of them trading benchmarks In the
digilife 80 video card roundup article the XT was faster in all 5 game benches ?
9500pro/9600XT ?1024x768 ?
SS: TSE ? ? 150.1/160.7
RTCW ? ? ? 135.1/154.3
UT3 ? ? ? ? 92.4/94.1
UNREAL II ? ? 63.0/ 69.0
Splinter Cell ? ? 22.0/27.9
I don?t know where digitlife got those 9500pro benches from, they have been known to rehash old benches without benefit of driver updates, but that was one slow 9500pro. It could be ATI?s unified compiler technology (3.6 Catalysts and above) have helped the 9600pro core a little more than the 9500. The original reviews with the 9600pro were with the 3.2?s I think. At the same price I would take the 9600XT over the 9500pro, although I know some people will still probably disagree with me. They are both good cards.