I have been lookiing for the highest quality 20" crt monitor availble with the best specs. I'm not sure if these are the best available but I found these two monitors that interested me. One is from viewsonic and the other is from Samsung. I was wondering which of these two monitors is the better one. If any one knows of a better crt monitor let me know.
Viewsonic P225fB - 2048x1536 @ 79HZ .24mm dot pitch
http://www.viewsonic.com/products/desktopdisplays/crtmonitors/proseries/p225fb/
Samsung 1100DF - 2048x1536 @ 75Hz .20mm dot pitch
http://product.samsung.com/cgi-bin/nabc...2c_product_detail.jsp?prod_id=CF21GSBU
I got one other question that has been bothing me. I'm having trouble understandint the 'Dot Pitch'. From what I understand its the size of each pixel right? Well what doesn't make sense is both monitors I listed above have the same viewable area(20") and same max resolution. BUT both have different dot pitch values. So how can both monitors have the same viewble area and resolution? For example shouldn't the samsung monitor either a)have a smaller viewable area or b) have a higher viewable resolution becuase of the smaller pixel size?
Hopefully some one could explain this.
Thanks!
Viewsonic P225fB - 2048x1536 @ 79HZ .24mm dot pitch
http://www.viewsonic.com/products/desktopdisplays/crtmonitors/proseries/p225fb/
Samsung 1100DF - 2048x1536 @ 75Hz .20mm dot pitch
http://product.samsung.com/cgi-bin/nabc...2c_product_detail.jsp?prod_id=CF21GSBU
I got one other question that has been bothing me. I'm having trouble understandint the 'Dot Pitch'. From what I understand its the size of each pixel right? Well what doesn't make sense is both monitors I listed above have the same viewable area(20") and same max resolution. BUT both have different dot pitch values. So how can both monitors have the same viewble area and resolution? For example shouldn't the samsung monitor either a)have a smaller viewable area or b) have a higher viewable resolution becuase of the smaller pixel size?
Hopefully some one could explain this.
Thanks!