Which memory manufacturer do you choose if price isn't a factor?

bgc99

Senior member
Aug 13, 2004
472
0
71
My current system is 5+ years old and runs OCZ. Just wondering what I should use the next time.

Thanks,
BGC
 

theAnimal

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2003
3,828
23
76
I have had nothing but good experiences with Mushkin, and I will not buy OCZ again.
 

Soulkeeper

Diamond Member
Nov 23, 2001
6,732
155
106
I used to like mushkin
gskill has equal or better quality in most cases for cheaper (my new favorite)

I don't think you can go wrong with one of them

this is really a brand loyalty question imo
you're likely to get various responses
 
Last edited:

nanaki333

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2002
3,772
13
81
i like me some A-DATA for budget builds. never had a bad DIMM with that stuff. for my home i prefer corsair. servers i get kingston, since those are the easiest to mate with server chipsets, that and it's not too pricey :)
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
Mushkin.

Sadly, price is usually a factor, as well as availability.
 

Burner27

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2001
4,452
50
101
Mushkin, Crucial or Corsair.

Corsair is what i currently use in all of my machines.
 

bryanl

Golden Member
Oct 15, 2006
1,157
8
81
Samsung or Crucial, but Crucial sells some "performance" memory rated for higher than normal voltages, 1.65V (DDR3) or 2.0V (DDR2), and performance memory should be avoided, regardless of brand. Few people realize that Samsung memory modules are available on the retail market.

The other companies mentioned do not make chips and typically use lower grade ones and do not test them very strictly. If cost were no factor, I would do everything to stay away from those minor manufactures, which include Crucial, Kingston, GSkill, Geil, Mushkin, A-Data, and Patriot.
 
Last edited:

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,572
10,208
126
GSkill, Kingston, Crucial, Corsair. Not in any particular order. A-data too, I guess.

I've got some HP "Smart Option" DDR2 in my rigs currently. Only a one-year warranty, so I don't recommend buying that, but they were $30 and $35 a stick for 2GB sticks, back when DDR2 was $50 for a 2GB stick at Newegg. Of course, after I purchased it, a few months later prices came back down to sanity.
 

CurseTheSky

Diamond Member
Oct 21, 2006
5,401
2
0
Corsair, with Crucial as a second. Lately I just buy whatever happens to be cheap, though I do tend to avoid OCZ. My last three kits have been G.Skill (twice), and Mushkin.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Corsair or PNY; always works at advertised voltage and speeds (and then some) and no bad modules.

Used to love OCZ back in the Plat Rev 2 days (nf4/AMD builds) but they have been nothing but fussy for me since and I will never buy their stuff again.

Lots of people like G-Skill, but I have had the worst luck with them and will not buy them again either. I am 50/50 with bad kits from them. Not worth my time anymore.
 

Snakecharmed

Junior Member
Jul 14, 2011
14
0
66
Back when PC133 was the rage, I bought nothing but Crucial. I must have gone through 5-6 PC133 sticks for two computers. Since then, I've purchased Mushkin DDR 400 and DDR2 800, PQI DDR 400, G.Skill DDR 400, and now my latest build has Patriot DDR3 1600. The Mushkin DDR 400 was defective and the G.Skill DDR 400 had a heat problem running at slower than default settings in an enclosed case.

If cost isn't a factor, I would always go with Corsair or Crucial. Since I don't usually overclock RAM, I just go with the RAM with the best reviews for the best price on Newegg regardless of brand.
 

razel

Platinum Member
May 14, 2002
2,337
93
101
Kingston
Crucial
Samsung Original

+1. It's hard to find Samsung at retail. I've only seen it in Dell and HP laptops. Nice to see Adata and Gskill being recommended. I always thought them to be budget RAM like OCZ back in 2004. I've noticed Adata usb flash and portable drive products have very good build quality.
 

IGemini

Platinum Member
Nov 5, 2010
2,472
2
81
You guys realize that OCZ scrapped their RAM production, right? Saying "I'll never buy OCZ RAM again" is kinda moot.

I use primarily Corsair and Patriot. Wouldn't mind Kingston, GSkill or Crucial. A-Data for budget upgrades.
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
Currently I like Corsair. But have bought Kingston and g.skill in the past without any issues. I kinda look around for problems when looking for CPU/MB combo and tend to avoid sticks others are having issues with. Most of the time Corsair isn't involved. G.skill seems to have some comparability issues with some sandy bridge boards although they do make some nice ram. OCZ ram I tend to avoid although I've never has issues with them in the past :)
 

mmaestro

Member
Jun 13, 2011
117
0
0
G.Skill and Corsair. I've had bad Samsung, OCZ, Crucial sets. But in the end, I don't think my sample size is big enough to make any firm conclusions: it seems like most folks just go with what's worked for them well in the past, and that's certainly my strategy, too.
 

kmmatney

Diamond Member
Jun 19, 2000
4,363
1
81
I have had nothing but good experiences with Mushkin, and I will not buy OCZ again.

Another vote for Mushkin. One a weird note, I have a cheapo single core Athlon II processor in my home server, which would never let me unlock the core. I was using a crucial memory at the time. I put in a set of Mushkin sticks 2 days ago, and the second core unlcoked no problem. The other other sticks back in - no dice. I can't explain why, but the Mushkin sticks gave me another solid and stable core.