• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which Linux Should I use????

JetsFanatic

Platinum Member
I want to set up linux on an older PC.
It is a 200 Mhz system with 64Meg RAM.
4 gig HD, CD-Rom, 4Meg video, no sound,
& 10baseT card.

Which flavour would be my best bet???
I just want the system for web browsing,
e-mail, seti@home, & possibly testing out
some thin clients. No games or office apps.
I will be adding it to a newtork with Win98,
Win XP, MAC 9.2, & MAC X systems on it.
Connecting to the internet via a DSL router.

Thanks for the info.

I currently have caldera 2.4 running on it,
but would like to hear your input.

Thanks again

 
most any popular distro should be fine, as long as you use a simple window manager (or none at all)...

blackbox, window maker, etc. are all popular, simple, and clean window managers....

KDE and Gnome are not.
 


<< FreeBSD


Linux is for people who hate microsoft. Don't stoop to that level. Find yourself a REAL OS.

- KeL
>>



Linux isnt that bad. Its a nice starting point. Atleast it was for me. Later "upgraded" to FreeBSD, then found the one true way 😀

Anyhow, RedHat, Slackware, Debian, and Gentoo should all be reasonable choices for the hardware.
 


<< FreeBSD


Linux is for people who hate microsoft. Don't stoop to that level. Find yourself a REAL OS.

- KeL
>>


that is what you could call a loaded post. 😉

anyways, mandrake, suse, and redhat are collectively thought of as the 'beginner' distros, slackware/debian/gentoo/linuxfromscratch are the "hard" ones, ones that you'll probably have LOTS of trouble with until you get comfortable and feel like you know what you're doing.
 


<<
anyways, mandrake, suse, and redhat are collectively thought of as the 'beginner' distros, slackware/debian/gentoo/linuxfromscratch are the "hard" ones, ones that you'll probably have LOTS of trouble with until you get comfortable and feel like you know what you're doing.
>>



Agreed 110%

If you are completely new to Unix, then I would probably recommend Mandrake, if you are somewhat Unix literate, then Redhat, Suse are the ones to try, but if you have worked with Unix before quite a bit, then slack/debian/gentoo would be the ones to try (or *BSD, for that matter).

Honestly, it is a very individual choice, as FoBoT said, try a few and pick a distro that you are most comfortable with.

Good luck!
 
in performance point of view ....

slack 7/8 is really great ... fast ...

he said he's using caldera, so i suppose he knows something ... 😀

matheus
 
Back
Top