Thank you fellas for backing me up. I'd like to try and figure out why people think a little economy car with a buzzy engine is so much superior to a 5.7 liter v-8. There's no replacement for displacement. Now i'm talking about stock engines here. The vette has it all, handling, top end speed, low end torque, relative comfort. But it is not a practicle car by any means. Now the reason i'm looking at a 93-95 vette is that i can get one for under 17,000 with low miles. You honda people can bolt on every trinket in the books and you still have an econo-box but now with even lower resale because noone wants a modded japanese car. If you add 5 grand worth of upgrades to a civic, you still have a car that your sister should be driving. I can dust ricers with my 12 year old pontiac, i can't imagine what i can do with that vette. My brother has a 2000 camaro ss and my god, that thing is a monster! The rice boys are just out to impress the other rice boys, those who appreciate real cars really don't care. It's just fun to watch them spend their mcdonald's checks on a new gewgaw or Type R sticer and still end up with a polished turd.