• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which is better?

Go with the PC2-6400 DDR2-800 mhz. 3GB is kind of stupid since you have 2 modules in dual channel and 1 in single channel
 
Originally posted by: drakore
Go with the PC2-6400 DDR2-800 mhz. 3GB is kind of stupid since you have 2 modules in dual channel and 1 in single channel
Click to expand...

I guess I should add that I have the following setup:

Slot 1 - 1gb
Slot 2 - 1gb
Slot 3 - 512mb
Slot 4 - 512mb

It is all running in Dual mode.
 
Originally posted by: Haui
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: drakore
Go with the PC2-6400 DDR2-800 mhz. 3GB is kind of stupid since you have 2 modules in dual channel and 1 in single channel</end quote></div>

I guess I should add that I have the following setup:

Slot 1 - 1gb
Slot 2 - 1gb
Slot 3 - 512mb
Slot 4 - 512mb

It is all running in Dual mode.
Click to expand...
Mine is setup as follows:

Slot 1 - 1gb
Slot 2 - 512mb
Slot 3 - 1gb
Slot 4 - 512mb

And it too runs fine in dual channel. :thumbsup:
 
I know it's a crazy suggestion, but how about everyone not suggest memory based on just OS or speed but by how much your total job load requires?

Vista doesn't actually require another Gig of memory. Yes it'll preload stuff for a perceived performance increase, but XP will also cache quite a bit too after the first read which kinda splits the difference except on either, whether the amount remaining is sufficient has EVERYTHING to do with how you're using the system.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top