Which Intel CPU for my needs no overclocking

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

2is

Diamond Member
Apr 8, 2012
4,281
131
106
No, it doesn't have better image quality. Come back when you can provide me with a $20 video card that can outperform HD4000 like you claimed

Thanks.
 

borisvodofsky

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2010
3,606
0
0
no

Sandy Bridge is about 13% faster than Nehalem on average. In AES or AVX capable applications, this should increase significantly.

Ivy Bridge is usually about 6% faster than Sandy Bridge.

Ivy Bridge is a die shrink. The fact any performance gain came out of it is exceptional.

bah.. 13%.. hell no... :sneaky: maybe if you cherry picked around.. there's been 5% average at best.
 

borisvodofsky

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2010
3,606
0
0
No, it doesn't have better image quality. Come back when you can provide me with a $20 video card that can outperform HD4000 like you claimed

Thanks.

clearly you can't read graphs. ;) :thumbsdown:

et.jpg
 
Last edited:

palladium

Senior member
Dec 24, 2007
539
2
81
I say get the 3570k. Since you don't do graphics stuff the HD4000 would be more than adequate. I wouldn't bother with a cheap discrete since it only adds cost and power with little or no benefit . You mentioned that a discrete is on the cards in the future if your friend needs it, I think that is a wise decision.

The 2500k is a good choice too, but you need to OC (i.e. more power consumption) to reach the 3570k performance. Consider if that extra $20 is worth the extra performance at the same (or lower) power envelope. I think it is.
 

borisvodofsky

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2010
3,606
0
0
I say get the 3570k. Since you don't do graphics stuff the HD4000 would be more than adequate. I wouldn't bother with a cheap discrete since it only adds cost and power with little or no benefit . You mentioned that a discrete is on the cards in the future if your friend needs it, I think that is a wise decision.

The 2500k is a good choice too, but you need to OC (i.e. more power consumption) to reach the 3570k performance. Consider if that extra $20 is worth the extra performance at the same (or lower) power envelope. I think it is.

WTF?? why would he buy a K cpu to begin with if he 'wasn't going to OC. :D
 

2is

Diamond Member
Apr 8, 2012
4,281
131
106
clearly you can't read graphs. ;) :thumbsdown:

et.jpg

What's that got to do with what you said?

Like I said, come back with a $20 card that can outperform HD4000? not expired deals on cards that are slower in just about everything except a 10 year old OpenGL game.

Keep digging.
 

palladium

Senior member
Dec 24, 2007
539
2
81
WTF?? why would he buy a K cpu to begin with if he 'wasn't going to OC. :D

It applies even if he overclocks. He needs to OC the 2500k more to be on par with the 3570k at a given frequency. That means more heat and power consumption (and faster degradation).