Which GEFORCE to buy ?

soric2

Member
Jul 25, 2001
104
0
0
I have a Gainward card expert geforce 3, I am now looking to upgrade, I am sticking with Nvidia so please no ATI advice, what/which is better the FX or geforce 4 TI ? I know its not a really smart quaetion but I am wondering after seeing a few reviews, I dont have the cash for the top notch FX either so a in between card is for me !!!

Any advice on which to purchace ?
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,108
16,017
136
Notice no feedback, when you specify No ATI advice. Get the hint.......

And try reading this post: 9500pro Advice
 

BenSkywalker

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,140
67
91
What is your price range?

The new 5600Ultra looks like it has some nice potential, has all the features and performance seems to be greatly improved over the initial reviews. If that is too much money for you, then I would suggest a Ti4200 would be your best bet. The price difference between the 4400/4600 is too small v the 5600U to make them good choice IMO and the lower end FX parts are a bit lacking in terms of what they can offer you right now.

If you can go as high as $300, then I'd suggest waiting until the 5900 Value hits, it would be a much better choice then any of them.
 

Chobits

Senior member
May 12, 2003
230
0
0
I don't see much of a point going from the Geforce3 to Geforce4...even the FX line is streching it a little. What I would do if I were you would be to start saving money and come fall when the new card come out (can you live with the Geforce3 for that much longer or is this something that must be done without a doubt?) get either Nvidia or ATI depending who hits that sweet price/preformance factor
 

squidman

Senior member
May 2, 2003
643
0
0
4600 is the fastest GF out there. It has the fastest memory (2.8), with 10.8 gb bandwidth and the fastest chip of all the GeForces.
4200 is the cheapest, and the weakest of all the GF's: least operations in a clock cycle, least polygons, texels, etc.
4400 is right after the 4600 in terms of performance.
4800SE is "lite" version of the 4400, with slower memory, and underclocked processor. THe only difference - is the useless AGP 8x.

Id say you buy the 4600 from leadtek. its 200 at newegg and is worth every penny.
 

BenSkywalker

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,140
67
91
Squidman-

Been out of the loop for a while?

4600 is the fastest GF out there. It has the fastest memory (2.8), with 10.8 gb bandwidth and the fastest chip of all the GeForces.

The 5800, 5800U and 5900U are all significantly faster then the 4600 :)
 

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
The difference isn't gonna be really noticeable from a GF3 to a Gf4/FX I think you should hold off for awhile.

Whats some of ur rig specs? the Vid Card might not be the bottleneck!
 

gf4200isdabest

Senior member
Jul 1, 2002
565
0
0
"I am now looking to upgrade, I am sticking with Nvidia so please no ATI advice"

Stop being a fanboy and get with the times. I have an nVidia card in my computer currently but if i was upgrading right now there wouldn't be any reason to buy an nVidia card regardless of my price range....
 

Wurrmm

Senior member
Feb 18, 2003
428
0
0
FX5900 Ultra has 256mb ram and is 499. The non ultra FX5900 has same clock and mem clock ans 128mb ram but for 399. These things are worth the wait, and should be out in around 2-4 weeks. I have a GF3 also and am moving to the ultra as soon as I can.
 

Wurrmm

Senior member
Feb 18, 2003
428
0
0
Originally posted by: gf4200isdabest
"I am now looking to upgrade, I am sticking with Nvidia so please no ATI advice"

Stop being a fanboy and get with the times. I have an nVidia card in my computer currently but if i was upgrading right now there wouldn't be any reason to buy an nVidia card regardless of my price range....

There is nothing wrong with sticking with a company you are comfortable with. Just because someone wants an Nvidia over an ATI does not make him/her and fanboy/girl. I trust Nvidia, and their drivers which is why I am sticking with them. Granted I still almost bought a 9800 pro until I saw the FX5900 Ultra. The difference is performance over the 9800 pro is notewrothy and to me the IQ differance is not that big deal, both look great to me (I do admit the 9800 pro is nicer upon close inspection).
 

squidman

Senior member
May 2, 2003
643
0
0
Originally posted by: BenSkywalker
Squidman-

Been out of the loop for a while?

4600 is the fastest GF out there. It has the fastest memory (2.8), with 10.8 gb bandwidth and the fastest chip of all the GeForces.

The 5800, 5800U and 5900U are all significantly faster then the 4600 :)

Oops! I thought he meant fastest from GF4 family!
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,393
8,552
126
so just as the 5900 is hitting retail ati is showing the R360 aren't they? wonder how that will do?
 

Mem

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
21,476
13
81
If you can go as high as $300, then I'd suggest waiting until the 5900 Value hits, it would be a much better choice then any of them.

That`s what I`m waiting for as well,but I do agree with BenSkywalker,ignore the ATi remarks since it`s your money your choice.I would never recommend a Nvidia card to somebody that wanted to buy an ATi card and vice versa,they should all respect the brand of your choice,regardless of whether it`s ATi,Nvidia,S3,Matrox etc.

Remember guys it`s a free world in most places ;).

I did read that the FX 5900 Value($299) won`t be available until July since the faster models will be the first to appear in late June.


GF4 Ti4200 wise, I would go with the Albatron Ti 4680P TURBO + VGA DVI-I & Tv-out - AGP 8x ,this will overclock to 4600 speeds.


Review here
 

Snooper

Senior member
Oct 10, 1999
465
1
76
The last two video cards in my computer have been Nvidia: TNT and then GF2Ultra. Three months ago, I decided to upgrade my video card. After doing the research, it appeared the 9700 Pro was the best card on the market for a resonable price (note: I DID NOT say BEST performance/price ratio!). So I bought one from a well know company that shall remain nameless to protect the innocent.

It arrrived a few days after I ordered and I installed it in my ASUS P4S333 based computer and powered up (note: I have been upgrading my computer for over 7 years and over 10 video cards. I know how to do upgrades and I have a static strap at home). Strange. No video. Computer will not fully boot, but it doesn't give any beep codes or voice codes. I double check how the card was seated (perfectly), power cable (connected), etc. No joy. It won't turn the video card on. I pulled all the other cards out of the system to see if there was some kind of conflict. No joy and no video still. So, I put the old GF2 back in and it boots right up without a problem.

I'm kind of leaning towards either MB or power supply issue (Not too strong on the power supply as I have a PC Power and Cooling 300 ATX supply that has worked flawlessly for almost 2 years) at this point. The next step to test out was download the latest firmware for my MB (I had kind of let that slip a little. I was two revs out of date...). Reinstall 9700 Pro and reboot. No video.

At this point, I give the company a call and explain the problem and what I have done so far. They issue an RMA and cross ship a new card (after carefully charging me card first, just incase I don't return the old card...). New-new card arrives. Install it. No video. I scream. I decide what the heck, I have had my eye on one of the new Antec 550 watt power supplies for a while, so now was as good a time as any to buy one. Install new power supply. reboot. No video. Sigh.

I reinstall my trusty GF2U card and start doing more digging online (I should have gotten to this point earlier, but I'm hard headed). I finally dig my way deep enough into Asus's forms and find that the P4S333 is not compatible with any AGP 8X CAPABLE card. It doesn't have to be set to run that speed, it only has to be able to and it won't work on this MB. Ok. Now I am getting somewhere. The new 655 boards where out and I was getting the hankering to test out out dual channel DDR anyway, so I bought the MSI 655 board. You know the drill: pull box, rip it to small bits, reinstall new bits and the old bits you are going to keep, try to figure out which sound card cable go where to the 5.1 speaker system, etc... Reboot. And I have video!!!!

Great! I grab the latest drivers (and make sure all my other drivers are up to date as well) and give FutureMark 2003 a run. Big difference in scores, no doubt. Almost 5000 with a 2.0 Ghz P4. Not bad at all. I fire up Army Ops and sure enough, I am seeing a 50% increase in frame rate. Nice. All is wel and I am happy.

For all of 6 weeks. Then my computer starts to get unstable. It locked up. Hard. A reboot got it running again and I didn't have any more problems. For 3 days. Then another lockup. Hard. Reboot. Etc. This gets worse and worse and I start getting windows XP errors after a lockup reboot saying the "9700 Pro video card" had a hardware failure. Great... I try to underclock the card (it was set to factory settings during all this time) to see if that would help. Not one lick. Another call to the manufacture. Anther RMA. Anther $15 sending the old card back.

The third card arrives and gets installed. Boots up with no issues. I fire up the game and start playing. I make it past the 10 minute mark and I start getting happy again. Four hours later, my computer locks up hard. Sigh. My computers case temperature is running about 40C and my CPU is running about 38C underload, so temp isn't a problem. Heck it is the same as it has been ever since I installed the P4 in my case (an In-Win Q500Z full tower case with lots of room and lots of cooling fans pushing and pulling). This time, when I contact the manufacture, I am no longer interested in a replacement card. I want my money back. They agree and the third 9700 Pro heads back to the manufacture. I'm still waiting on the refund, but this is not unusual as I only sent it back last Tuesday.

I would be perfectly willing to write this off as a fluke with this one manufacturers design. Then I remembered a lock up problem my cousin was having with his computer late last year. The problem then was traced back to an ATI manufactured 8500 card. Same symptoms: ran perfect in 2D, but was unstable in 3D. I am not willing to so easily write this off now.

So, like Soric2, I will be sticking to NVidia for my next card as well. I think when the refund come in, I'm going to stuff it in the bank and wait until the 5900 is on the market and less than $400. That is not much more than I paid for my 9700 Pro ($320, but it wasn't a no name brand either) and I will have a couple of pay checks to stick a little more money away. I hope this was a fluke. But it fits with the various stories I have heard about problems with ATI based cards. Just a lot more of them out there than with the Nvidia cards, even though there are a lot more nvidia cards on the market. They have made huge inroads in the last year, no doubt. The NV30 was a joke (also, no doubt!), so let's see how the NV35 works out. Maybe in another couple of years I'll give ATI another chance with video cards (If they are still doing as well in performance as they are now). But a 5% increase in frame rates is not NEARLY worth an unstable system.
 

bjc112

Lifer
Dec 23, 2000
11,460
0
76
Originally posted by: gf4200isdabest
"I am now looking to upgrade, I am sticking with Nvidia so please no ATI advice"

Stop being a fanboy and get with the times. I have an nVidia card in my computer currently but if i was upgrading right now there wouldn't be any reason to buy an nVidia card regardless of my price range....

Get the 9500 Pro and listen to the man!

:D

 

Krk3561

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2002
3,242
0
0
The 5600 Ultra could give the 9500 Pro some pretty good competition. I would suggest to wait till the 5600 Ultra comes out (should be anytime now) and there are some reviews to see which is the better card.
 

bjc112

Lifer
Dec 23, 2000
11,460
0
76
Originally posted by: Krk3561
The 5600 Ultra could give the 9500 Pro some pretty good competition. I would suggest to wait till the 5600 Ultra comes out (should be anytime now) and there are some reviews to see which is the better card.

Thats a good point, considering it will give it a run for its money, prices will fall.

Might be best to wait!

 

AthlonXP

Banned
Apr 19, 2003
479
0
0
Originally posted by: gf4200isdabest
"I am now looking to upgrade, I am sticking with Nvidia so please no ATI advice"

Stop being a fanboy and get with the times. I have an nVidia card in my computer currently but if i was upgrading right now there wouldn't be any reason to buy an nVidia card regardless of my price range....


Nvidia has nothing that can compete with a Radeon 9700 (non pro) IN ITS PRICE RANGE which can be had for $230 from many reliable vendors. Plus if you overclock it a lil, omg:D.

Radeon 9700 128mb OEM shipped free $229
 

Expendable

Junior Member
May 17, 2003
11
0
0
I'm an ATi Fan myself, but I have been impressed with the specs on some of the FX series video cards. I'd say try fow an FX 5600 or better if you can (or if you can wait).