• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which CS is better?

TheRyuu

Diamond Member
I was just wondering which one you like/play more of. Although I do like the original CS gamplay better, the CS:S has nice shiny visuals.
 
Source.

1.6 has terrible terrible bullet holes, they dont show up where you actually hit, they just show up randomly.

throwing nades was unrealistic, flashes were unrealistic. it just wasnt near as good as Source.
 
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Source.

1.6 has terrible terrible bullet holes, they dont show up where you actually hit, they just show up randomly.

throwing nades was unrealistic, flashes were unrealistic. it just wasnt near as good as Source.

Realistic? ROFL... You don't play CS for its realism.

1.6 all the way.
 
1.6 feels more complete and solid, but I like the physics in Source better. Bullet holes just never seemed consistent to me in 1.6. Also, Source lets you knock around objects like filing cabinets which can drastically change gameplay.
 
Originally posted by: nycxandy
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Source.

1.6 has terrible terrible bullet holes, they dont show up where you actually hit, they just show up randomly.

throwing nades was unrealistic, flashes were unrealistic. it just wasnt near as good as Source.

Realistic? ROFL... You don't play CS for its realism.

1.6 all the way.

most everything in CS is pretty realistic, minus what the bullets should do when they hit a person (slow them down). however it gets good points in what different objects to to bullets and everything else...
 
Back
Top