You really have nothing else than the lower clocked Phenom X6.??..
Yes. I have a pair of Q9300 rigs, now at stock, with single PCI-E x16 slots, a pair (one not yet built) of G3258 rigs, one at 3.8, with single PCI-E x16 slots.
My only existing rig with dual PCI-E x16, has a 1045T in it. It is AM3+, so I could drop in an FX.
I don't own any Intel quad-cores newer than the Q9300 currently, nor any Intel-based mobos with dual PCI-E x16 slots, save for a DFI X48 board that is still BNIB.
For FPU that doesnt matter, there are only four on a FX8xxx but they are twice as powerfull, if not more, as a single X6 FPU, the scores in the benches let no doubt about it, check Cinebench for SSE2 heavy bench, Povray is also adequate for FP comparisons.
What is DC.??..
Distributed Computing.
If possible a 8350 is better, the OP somewhat sell some PCs, if it s for a sale i wouldnt advice overclockings if there s a chip that manage to reach the targeted frequency at stocks settings, unless of course that the buyer agree to the thing to save some costs and get the PC at lower price, although there s not much difference between a 8320 and a 8350, something like 35 here, surely the same $ amount in the US.
No, this is for personal use, for coin mining and some (slight) gaming. Also for heating my room in the winter.
Does it matter for coin mining, whether you use a PC with dual video cards, versus two PCs with single (same) video cards? Is there any benefit for having two together in the same PC for hashing?
Just thinking, it would be easier on my PSU if they were seperate, there wouldn't be any Crossfire issues. (My BIL has a PC I built for him, with CF 6870 cards, and he says that CF crashes half of his games if it's enabled.) And it would be easier on the PSU(s).
I'm wondering if I would even notice a difference in games, with two 7950s, versus one, at 1080P?