• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

which console shooter is superior?

Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
just tried the demo for resistance and it was really fun.
Click to expand...

ive always wanted to try Resistance but i dont own a ps3, i recently got rid of my 360 and thinking about getting a ps3 for the blu ray.
 
Out of those 2? Halo. It was much more impressive and innovative for the console FPS genre. Of course, it can't really compare to the PC greats. 😉
 
I had never played a dual-analog FPS before renting Resistance and yet I breezed right through it on Normal. WAY too easy even though I'm a keyboard + mouse guy fo' loif (I thought it supported USB KB+M).

Anyway, Goldeneye 007 isn't dual-analog, but I played it like it was ("Turok style" with M-look mapped to the stick and walk+strafe mapped to the C-buttons). 2nd level bonus unlock FTW (super hard + luck).
 
It depends on your taste. Everyone likes different game play. Especially with console shooters. They vary as much as they can from the competition to make their experience unique. On PCs it's the same mechanics over and over again because it works.
 
What a tough question? On one side you have the PS3, on the other side you have the 360... need I say more.

Because I don't and probably never will own a PS3, I haven't played Resistance: Fall of Man. But I've played Halo and Halo 2. Halo is awesome. Halo 2 sucks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top