• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which car would you get?

This was posted not too long ago, someone wanted to know which to get

Either STi or TT Supra for me, S2000 I would consider though, or a mustang gt
 
Well some of the car are nice but very different.

Like I voted GTO as I like a car that has a lot of low end torque so I can get around and if I floor it, she will move really fast.

BUT if you don;t mind missing the low torque and want some high reving action and/or live in a haevy snow area, then get the Subaru.


Those are my top 2 pics with different reasons behind each.
 
I voted for the GTO only because I love my new Grand AM 😀 (what I could afford when I was looking last month)
 
I picked GTO too, but it was a hard decision. I live in Michigan, and winters are kinda hard, so the WRX would have been nice, but there is just something about the GTO that lures me to it.
 
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Well some of the car are nice but very different.

Like I voted GTO as I like a car that has a lot of low end torque so I can get around and if I floor it, she will move really fast.

BUT if you don;t mind missing the low torque and want some high reving action and/or live in a haevy snow area, then get the Subaru.


Those are my top 2 pics with different reasons behind each.
Click to expand...

Actually, the Subaru is more torquey than you might think. That 2.5l engine makes the turbo lag much much less noticeable than say the Evo.
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Well some of the car are nice but very different.

Like I voted GTO as I like a car that has a lot of low end torque so I can get around and if I floor it, she will move really fast.

BUT if you don;t mind missing the low torque and want some high reving action and/or live in a haevy snow area, then get the Subaru.


Those are my top 2 pics with different reasons behind each.
Click to expand...

Actually, the Subaru is more torquey than you might think. That 2.5l engine makes the turbo lag much much less noticeable than say the Evo.
Click to expand...



I agree it is not that bad, BUT compared to the GTO... its not even close
 
Originally posted by: sniperruff
.
Click to expand...

You're looking at the Sedan prices not the Coupe Noob

LoL Edited before I could quote you. Bastage 😛 😉

Oh yea add 599 for destination charge
 
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Well some of the car are nice but very different.

Like I voted GTO as I like a car that has a lot of low end torque so I can get around and if I floor it, she will move really fast.

BUT if you don;t mind missing the low torque and want some high reving action and/or live in a haevy snow area, then get the Subaru.


Those are my top 2 pics with different reasons behind each.
Click to expand...

When you floor it, you'll be shifting at high rpm's, so wouldn't you want high end torque?

Once you get going, you'll be staying in the upper range of RPM's, so that's really where you'd want all the power to be
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top