• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which car 3000GT VR4, Mustang GT, or 300ZX?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
300ZXTT. The market for them has been a little stirred up now that the 350Z is out. Heck, I might be selling mine.
 
between the two i'd pick the vr4, simply because of awd and the fact that it has a backseat.
The 300ZX has a back seat too. Well, more specifically, some 300ZX's have a back seat. The ZX was available both as a strict 2-seater and as a 2+2. The 2+2 ZX's have a longer wheelbase than the strict 2-seaters.

I'd go with the Mustang personally, but only if you're talking about a Fox-platform 'Stang with the 302 cid V8 (aka the 5.0). I don't care much for the new 4.6 litre.

Between the 3000GT and the 300ZX, I'd go with the ZX because the GT has too many little electronic doo-dads and I've had quite enough of dealing with electrical problems in cars. Plus, the ZX is "purer". I mean it's more simplified. A good sports car, IMO, should not be complex.

ZV
 
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
between the two i'd pick the vr4, simply because of awd and the fact that it has a backseat.
The 300ZX has a back seat too. Well, more specifically, some 300ZX's have a back seat. The ZX was available both as a strict 2-seater and as a 2+2. The 2+2 ZX's have a longer wheelbase than the strict 2-seaters.

the turboed versions don't..and since he's comparing the zx and the vr4 here, i'd imagine he's referring to those..

Jules

 
Back
Top