BlackJesus03
Banned
- Feb 20, 2004
- 119
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: csf
Originally posted by: AvesPKS
Originally posted by: MaxDSP
Originally posted by: DrumminBoy
Great Gatsby
I actually liked Great Gatsby.
I guess my two least favorites would be "Madame Bovary" (waah, waah, I live in France and I didn't want to marry my husband), and "The Awakening" (waah waah, I live in New Orleans and my husband's rich and we hire someone to raise our kids, but that's not enough, I want to marry someone else, waah, waah)...:|
I agree with you exactly on those two. I have a pretty extensive lit background, but I find these to be overrated tripe that infuriates me more than provides any insight. Somehow it's chic to sympathize with self-absorbed, spoiled, and fickle women who only make decisions based on emotions without weighing the consequences; especially when that kind of crap is portrayed as some masterpiece of feminist art. Ugh.
Other literary works that irritate me:
Anything by William Faulkner: It's a shame that his really twisted and interesting plots can be dragged down by confusing and convoluted narrating schemes that take way too much reviewing to follow.
Anything by Jane Austen: Too fluffy for me.
Anything by Borges: Too much pretentious mind games, no content.
Anything post-modern: same deal
1984: Makes a worthwhile social commentary, but the way it's parroted by idiotic sci-fi fans who like to act like Chicken Little and think they're profound and educated by comparing everything to Big Brother and fascism (ironically many of them while supporting socialist policies) by citing this book. See P&N for many examples.
I agree with the whole Jane Austen bit. She has a very weak plot in Sense and Stupidability, and her use of dialogue sucks @ss. Although, if my Literary Classics by Women teacher saw this she'd have a conniption fit. She wants to have Jane Austen's baby.