Steeplerot
Lifer
- Mar 29, 2004
- 13,051
- 6
- 81
Originally posted by: MisterCornell
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Show me the ONE msm news station that stood up a said NO to the war..... *crickets*
Nope, they jumped right in and positioned themselves between bush's butt-cheeks the whole time.
NOONE had the liberals back and none have yet to back us up.
If we even want anything vaugely balanced -it's foriegn news.
Showing a 30 second blurb of a "left" issus that is obviously geared to discredit the cause does not make them
a liberal media source :roll:
That's because the news is not supposed to take stances on issues, you dumbass. They're supposed to report what happens, not make it up.
Still, that doesn't stop them from subtle bias, which they pull off by selecting some stories and not others, and putting a slant to everything they show.
Before the Iraq War, the media went out of its way to portray how wonderful things were in Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Dan Rather went to Bagdadh and had a puff piece interview with Saddam Hussein. That's about the most he can do. And right after the invasion, CNN complained about some pottery that was broken in a museum in Baghdad. That was their way of being negative about the war.
Compare that to CLinton's strike on the former Yugoslavia. That was always portrayed in a very positive way, because it was unfashionable to oppose Clinton wars.
None of the "slanted" issues are valid left issues. Just reactionary fluff to enforce stereotypes or further the rights corprate agenda with smoke and mirrors. This is why I stated NO US tv almost 100% anymore is valid source of news IMO. This goes for the rest of the media too.
For about 10 years now same old crap misrepresenting the left while being total whores... Sorry your just catching on.
