Thank you for your note. As you may know, our search results change
regularly as we update our index. Normal changes you observe may observe
include images falling out of the index. We realize these changes can be
confusing. However, these processes are completely automated. We currently
include over 880 million images on the web, and it is certainly our intent
to represent the content of the internet fairly and accurately. Thanks for
taking the time to write.
Regards,
The Google Team
Originally posted by: Czar
got a reply
Thank you for your note. As you may know, our search results change
regularly as we update our index. Normal changes you observe may observe
include images falling out of the index. We realize these changes can be
confusing. However, these processes are completely automated. We currently
include over 880 million images on the web, and it is certainly our intent
to represent the content of the internet fairly and accurately. Thanks for
taking the time to write.
Regards,
The Google Team
make sense?
Originally posted by: Czar
got a reply
Thank you for your note. As you may know, our search results change
regularly as we update our index. Normal changes you observe may observe
include images falling out of the index. We realize these changes can be
confusing. However, these processes are completely automated. We currently
include over 880 million images on the web, and it is certainly our intent
to represent the content of the internet fairly and accurately. Thanks for
taking the time to write.
Regards,
The Google Team
make sense?
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Internet noobies...
Dogpile results
Yes there was life prior to Google.
rapist pic
Thanks for the reply.
About updating the index, how does that work exactly?
For example if I search for "Lynndie England" in the google web search
I come up with for example this page as a second result.
- http://fourstrings.fanspace.com/photo2.html
Which is a page about her. The images used have her name in the filename.
- http://fourstrings.fanspace.co.../lynndie_england_q.jpg
There are also countless of other webpages which are similar. How can
images then fall out of index? doesnt the image bot use the same data
as the web bot?
Originally posted by: oldman420
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Internet noobies...
Dogpile results
Yes there was life prior to Google.
rapist pic
you go
![]()
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: JHoNNy1OoO
But the images were there before. :/
But the images were there before
Exactly.
They are obviously working under the direction of the current Administration, they have been trained well.
Originally posted by: cdibona
Hi all,
We posted an official response here on slashdot
on slashdot
(and other places![]()
Originally posted by: cdibona
Don't be like that! I really like anandtech, I'm just posting everywhere about this. Anandtech is terrific.
Chris
The censoring is active even for the U.S.
Originally posted by: digiram
haha, this is funny. Can't find images of abu grahib, but miserable failure yeilds http://www.google.com/search?h...mp;q=miserable+failure
