You won nothing. Did you read my post?
"I would be willing to bet there are more blacks, asians, arabs, and hispanics in Michigan than in the whole of Europe."
Yet you proclaim victory based on statistics that bare no relevance to each other. "Foreign population" certainly includes non-German "whites", it doesn't implicitly mean "non-whites", and you gave not an iota of information on the races I specifically mentioned; blacks, asians, hispanics. I will amend my prior statement to exclude Arabs and Asians, because statistically the Arab and Asian population is very law-abiding, with the exception of some Asian street gangs in certain regions, but overall it cannot be said that Arabs and Asians commit a disproportionate amount of violent crimes, as is especially true of blacks and hispanics.
It matters because the vast majority of our violent crimes are disproportionately committed by blacks and hispanics.
In the UK, their violent crimes are disproportionately committed by blacks; immigrants from the West Indies and Jamaica in particular.
It matters because if you compare US 'white' crime rate across the board (urban, suburban, rural) with Europe's 'white' crite rate (urban, suburban, rural), they are virtually identical.
The disparity comes almost entirely from the disproportionate contribution to violent crime made by certain non-white populations. I.E. we have more violent crime because we have far more non-whites who commit a disproportionate amount of violent crimes.
