HAL9000
Lifer
isn't that the reality of the current market situation?
Sort of but not legally.
isn't that the reality of the current market situation?
My argument is that it shouldn't be required, Art should be free to those who don't want to pay, if you want to donate that is your choice but it shouldn't be required.
artists have tried that, doesn't seem to have worked out too well. Radiohead tried it, figures were never released but their next album is going to cost money.
You seem to have missed my first point (the bolded above) and only addressed the second point.I understand that, and they would be free to do so but rather than paying for the music they could donate, the same as open source software. People with connections wouldn't have a leg up on people without, there would be no music production companies you could release your music on radio stations or over the internet for free, everyone could listen and just like a popular youtube video it would spread across the planet. For free...No, but they wouldn't be able to devote their life to it. They would have less time to spend on it and therefore make less progress in their lifetime, slowing the advancement of everyone else. They would be too busy trying to find a way to put food on the table some other way.
You are also confusing someone who creates 'art' for the money and someone who creates art because they love it and that art is so good that people are willing to spend money on it.
You seem to have missed my first point (the bolded above) and only addressed the second point.
Zune, rip from CDs, occasionally Amazon's music service.
I used to used iTunes, but that software (on Windows) annoyed me so much, so I don't bother.
I love Zune. While it doesn't have every song I want, it has about 70% of what I want, and my collection is easily synced/playable across my PC, laptop, Dell Venue Pro, Kin One, and Xbox 360.