The Fraser Institute? One of the Koch Bros projects?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraser_Institute
And, of course, nobody wants to talk about how nations having higher "economic freedom" suffered more in the collapse of the economic freedom of the Bush era, with the Ownership Society chief among them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Freedom_of_the_World
It's very much the same thing that happened in 1929, 1873 & other famous economic faceplants.
The financial elite didn't really suffer, though, just the little people. Boom/bust cycles are great for the rich, not so much for everybody else, and that's what "economic freedom" delivers.
Doublespeak? obviously. One can't possibly be said to be free unless they're free to vote & to participate in governmental decision making. There is no such thing as benevolent dictatorship.
Let's see...
Feel the need to duh-vert & deny?
I mean 1873 means the government should control your money, because as you imply freedom is slavery. You also purposefully ignore personal freedoms. Well, I guess we better not discuss that. Ignorance is strength. Then democracies are more peaceful than HK (Iraq War) and believe in the rights of citizens and nations (Project Ajax). Yeah that Iraq War. That was definitely HKs fault. Well war is peace.
Here's a different link.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/0...a-human-freedom-ranking-how-is-that-possible/
From that article
Q: Does democracy matter?
A: The type of government was not included as a category in the Fraser Institutes Index of Human Freedom. Were measuring freedom, not democracy, Mr. McMahon said, adding that democracy should not be confused with freedom. He said that even though democracies may be better able to support stable freedom over the long term, it does not equal freedom. Democracy is a power relationship while freedom means lack of constraints, Mr. Mahon said. Iran in many ways has a democracy, but it would be silly to say that people in Iran, because they can vote are freer than people in Hong Kong, he said.This is not to say that democracy is not a good thing
that is certainly a good thing, but democracy on its own is not freedom.
Now tell us that as an individual you are better off in Iran than HK? Good luck with that.
Note the last bolded sentence. Democracy is desirable but on it's own not freedom. Shall I post the definitions of both words and you can argue with Merriam Webster or the OED?
Yeah, since the transfer of HK to China the press has been censoring itself since there is a fear of Big Brother coming down on them and that's a real concern. That would never happen here where lets say a reporter broke a story and the government went after them. Oh wait- it did. No, that's impossible! Democracies are freedom and that means that the story must be bogus. Newthink.
Obviously democracy is the preferable form of government, but that's not what was being addressed. It's the overall freedoms the people of each nation enjoy.
Note that Canada finished ahead of us in this study. The Canada who has a better regulatory system (not more, but better) with banking? The same Canada who didn't suffer from like we did from the finance scandal? Yeah, the Koch brothers sure pulled the wool over our eyes! They must have got things right just to confuse you. But you complain about economic freedom being a bad thing, and with Koch behind the wheel Canada should have come out worse. Well that's your doublethink.
HK came out ahead of the US based on a higher economic freedom. Personal freedoms are ranked lower. Aha! You got me. Clearly money is more important than liberty. Now you can be all smug. Oh, the Netherlands is higher than HK. Yeah that run away Rightist nation, all money and social chaos. Pull the other one. It ranks lower on the economic score than us, but the personal liberty stuff just got in the way. And of course they must be using anti gay criteria for freedom of religon because thats what the Koch brothers would do. Oh, no it's the opposite. They take freedom of religion, sexual orientation, freedom of speech, of the press and more into consideration. Yep, the freedom of homosexuals to be free from harassment and enjoy civil liberties are considered a positive factor. Clearly a right leaning sentiment.
Clearly this is dripping with sarcasm, but you didn't even bother to see what the criteria for this was before you replied. You went back to 1873 to convince us that having control over our money instead of the government is a bad thing, then cited Koch, which clearly has a business interest as an implied poison pill who if they were controlling this Canada wouldn't have come out better and the Netherlands? Yeah.
You haven't addressed the points, you went on to peripheral tangents to discredit what you didn't bother to understand.
Now go and look at the study, find a couple things you don't like and say "Aha!" and ignore the bulk of the criteria in order to continue.