• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

where are you moving when the US goes to pot?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

where are you going when america goes under?

  • staying where i am!

  • moving somewhere else in the US

  • canada

  • england

  • australia

  • latin american country

  • other european country

  • asian country

  • african country

  • one of the poles (comedy option)

Results are only viewable after voting.
For the past decade I have been saying that once I retire from the military I would move to Australia and just live the life of pot smoking with koalas and being in the outback.

If the US collapsed under the weight of liberal welfare systems yet there were still a means to travel to Australia I'd go in a heartbeat.
 
Jhhnn said:
No link, of course. Your last sentence is perhaps some of the most exquisite doublespeak ever uttered, btw. In our modern world, freedom w/o democracy is possible only in the minds of fools. The frontier closed over 100 years ago, in case you hadn't noticed.
Click to expand...

Link

Note it is personal and economic freedom. Seriously though, doublespeak? You would do Orwell proud. We can talk generally about the link between democracy and freedom, but they aren't the same.

Since I provided what you asked for let's see how you spin this.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
Link

Note it is personal and economic freedom. Seriously though, doublespeak? You would do Orwell proud. We can talk generally about the link between democracy and freedom, but they aren't the same.

Since I provided what you asked for let's see how you spin this.
Click to expand...

The Fraser Institute? One of the Koch Bros projects?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraser_Institute

And, of course, nobody wants to talk about how nations having higher "economic freedom" suffered more in the collapse of the economic freedom of the Bush era, with the Ownership Society chief among them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Freedom_of_the_World

It's very much the same thing that happened in 1929, 1873 & other famous economic faceplants.

The financial elite didn't really suffer, though, just the little people. Boom/bust cycles are great for the rich, not so much for everybody else, and that's what "economic freedom" delivers.

Doublespeak? obviously. One can't possibly be said to be free unless they're free to vote & to participate in governmental decision making. There is no such thing as benevolent dictatorship.
 
Jhhnn said:
The Fraser Institute? One of the Koch Bros projects?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraser_Institute

And, of course, nobody wants to talk about how nations having higher "economic freedom" suffered more in the collapse of the economic freedom of the Bush era, with the Ownership Society chief among them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Freedom_of_the_World

It's very much the same thing that happened in 1929, 1873 & other famous economic faceplants.

The financial elite didn't really suffer, though, just the little people. Boom/bust cycles are great for the rich, not so much for everybody else, and that's what "economic freedom" delivers.

Doublespeak? obviously. One can't possibly be said to be free unless they're free to vote & to participate in governmental decision making. There is no such thing as benevolent dictatorship.
Click to expand...


Let's see...
Feel the need to duh-vert & deny?
Click to expand...

I mean 1873 means the government should control your money, because as you imply freedom is slavery. You also purposefully ignore personal freedoms. Well, I guess we better not discuss that. Ignorance is strength. Then democracies are more peaceful than HK (Iraq War) and believe in the rights of citizens and nations (Project Ajax). Yeah that Iraq War. That was definitely HKs fault. Well war is peace.

Here's a different link.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/0...a-human-freedom-ranking-how-is-that-possible/

From that article
Q: Does democracy matter?
A: The type of government was not included as a category in the Fraser Institute’s Index of Human Freedom. “We’re measuring freedom, not democracy,” Mr. McMahon said, adding that democracy should not be confused with freedom. He said that even though democracies may be better able to support stable freedom over the long term, it does not equal freedom. Democracy is a power relationship while freedom means lack of constraints, Mr. Mahon said. “Iran in many ways has a democracy, but it would be silly to say that people in Iran, because they can vote are freer than people in Hong Kong,” he said.“This is not to say that democracy is not a good thing … that is certainly a good thing, but democracy on its own is not freedom.”
Click to expand...

Now tell us that as an individual you are better off in Iran than HK? Good luck with that.

Note the last bolded sentence. Democracy is desirable but on it's own not freedom. Shall I post the definitions of both words and you can argue with Merriam Webster or the OED?

Yeah, since the transfer of HK to China the press has been censoring itself since there is a fear of Big Brother coming down on them and that's a real concern. That would never happen here where lets say a reporter broke a story and the government went after them. Oh wait- it did. No, that's impossible! Democracies are freedom and that means that the story must be bogus. Newthink.

Obviously democracy is the preferable form of government, but that's not what was being addressed. It's the overall freedoms the people of each nation enjoy.

Note that Canada finished ahead of us in this study. The Canada who has a better regulatory system (not more, but better) with banking? The same Canada who didn't suffer from like we did from the finance scandal? Yeah, the Koch brothers sure pulled the wool over our eyes! They must have got things right just to confuse you. But you complain about economic freedom being a bad thing, and with Koch behind the wheel Canada should have come out worse. Well that's your doublethink.

HK came out ahead of the US based on a higher economic freedom. Personal freedoms are ranked lower. Aha! You got me. Clearly money is more important than liberty. Now you can be all smug. Oh, the Netherlands is higher than HK. Yeah that run away Rightist nation, all money and social chaos. Pull the other one. It ranks lower on the economic score than us, but the personal liberty stuff just got in the way. And of course they must be using anti gay criteria for freedom of religon because thats what the Koch brothers would do. Oh, no it's the opposite. They take freedom of religion, sexual orientation, freedom of speech, of the press and more into consideration. Yep, the freedom of homosexuals to be free from harassment and enjoy civil liberties are considered a positive factor. Clearly a right leaning sentiment.

Clearly this is dripping with sarcasm, but you didn't even bother to see what the criteria for this was before you replied. You went back to 1873 to convince us that having control over our money instead of the government is a bad thing, then cited Koch, which clearly has a business interest as an implied poison pill who if they were controlling this Canada wouldn't have come out better and the Netherlands? Yeah.

You haven't addressed the points, you went on to peripheral tangents to discredit what you didn't bother to understand.

Now go and look at the study, find a couple things you don't like and say "Aha!" and ignore the bulk of the criteria in order to continue.
 
This is the statement I found objectionable.

Hayabusa Rider said:
I'd argue that if democracy takes away liberty then we'd be better off without it.
Click to expand...

Democracy always limits liberty to some degree or another, as does any form of government. Like it or not, democracy, particularly within a constitutional framework, provides the greatest degree of personal liberty. It does that, in part, by limiting the liberty of the strongest, the greediest, the most callous and the most psychopathic among us. Other forms of govt inevitably advance them to the top.

Your most recent reply is a example of desperate denial, btw. The limited choices presented to voters in the Theocratic State of Iran are not democracy, at all, but rather lipstick on a pig. The economic choices presented to the average citizen in an economic oligarchy aren't freedom, either, certainly not in a system of interdependent specialization such as our own.
 
There has been recent increase in anti-american threads.
Have any of you ever thought before blaming the government or the state, that your lives suck because of you in the first place?
 
Sheep221 said:
There has been recent increase in anti-american threads.
Have any of you ever thought before blaming the government or the state, that your lives suck because of you in the first place?
Click to expand...

No thanks to morons like jhhnn and his ilk who hate freedom and America. To them it's always never their own fault and these scumbags blame others.
 
Meh, by that point we'll have full-on gun confiscation, so I guess I'll have to go out back and look for those guns I lost in that boating accident a few years prior. :whiste:
 
Sheep221 said:
There has been recent increase in anti-american threads.
Have any of you ever thought before blaming the government or the state, that your lives suck because of you in the first place?
Click to expand...

But it's more fun to drop out of high school and blame the rich for their lack of any marketable skill beyond punching buttons at the cash register.
 
Jhhnn said:
This is the statement I found objectionable.



Democracy always limits liberty to some degree or another, as does any form of government. Like it or not, democracy, particularly within a constitutional framework, provides the greatest degree of personal liberty. It does that, in part, by limiting the liberty of the strongest, the greediest, the most callous and the most psychopathic among us. Other forms of govt inevitably advance them to the top.

Your most recent reply is a example of desperate denial, btw. The limited choices presented to voters in the Theocratic State of Iran are not democracy, at all, but rather lipstick on a pig. The economic choices presented to the average citizen in an economic oligarchy aren't freedom, either, certainly not in a system of interdependent specialization such as our own.
Click to expand...

Well the Egyptians might argue that democracy can let you down. I'll edit out my last remark as irrelevant and note that you haven't responded to my points.

Regarding democracy my statement stands. I know of no competent adult that doesn't understand that liberties are always limited. A reasonably intelligent person can look up words and would learn that freedom is not democracy. I've already provided a context and explanation. Post a dictionary definition of equivalence if you like. Also your statement begs the question. The freest societies are democracies does not mean that ALL democracies MUST have more freedom than any alternative. If you want to say that no country has had it worse than HK because they arent a democracy then please do and discredit the criteria.

You claim that Iran isn't a democracy. Well they have parties and candidates and vote for different people. You might be tempted to say we enjoy unfettered choice whereas Iran does not. That argument has problems if you try it. Frankly I dislike authoritharians if they hide behind elections or not. If you don't like the ratings that's fine but the points I raise about ideological bias left or right doesn't fit the results. The Netherlands being a Koch shill? Try to sell that.

If you want to say who is a democracy and who is not fine. That's not what was being measured.
 
Last edited:
DixyCrat said:
Australia or NZ; possible in another 2 years.
Click to expand...

NZ is appealing but the wife would have to give up visiting family and that's not happening. There's a lot of appeal to relocating to the southern island. Good climate and more elbow room. Out of curiosity I checked the immigration requirements of several countries a few years back and we'd have no problem getting in but family ties matter.
 
How's NZ's gun laws, I know some of you on the right wouldn't like Australia's gun laws at all. IIRC, you must also have secured/gained employment in Australia BEFORE you can immigrate there.
 
soundforbjt said:
How's NZ's gun laws, I know some of you on the right wouldn't like Australia's gun laws at all. IIRC, you must also have secured/gained employment in Australia BEFORE you can immigrate there.
Click to expand...
That's speciality of america, the rest of the world is happy without having armory in the backyard, if you want to be somewhere else you either customize to local laws and traditions and way of living, or you don't travel, simple.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
You claim that Iran isn't a democracy. Well they have parties and candidates and vote for different people. You might be tempted to say we enjoy unfettered choice whereas Iran does not. That argument has problems if you try it. Frankly I dislike authoritharians if they hide behind elections or not. If you don't like the ratings that's fine but the points I raise about ideological bias left or right doesn't fit the results. The Netherlands being a Koch shill? Try to sell that.
Click to expand...

Oh please. Political candidates in Iran must pass muster with the religious Guardian Council, Voters have the same kind of choices as in the Republican Presidential Primary- Right, Far Right, & Fringewhack.

The Netherlands isn't a Constitutional Monarchy, a Democracy, much like the UK? Funny that-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_the_Netherlands
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
NZ is appealing but the wife would have to give up visiting family and that's not happening. There's a lot of appeal to relocating to the southern island. Good climate and more elbow room. Out of curiosity I checked the immigration requirements of several countries a few years back and we'd have no problem getting in but family ties matter.
Click to expand...

Well, if the US goes to pot it may be time to move the family.

guns in NZ:

The estimated total number of guns held by civilians in New Zealand is 925,0001 to 1,200,0002. In the absence of registration for most firearms, only an approximation is possible

In New Zealand, private possession of fully automatic weapons is restricted to police-approved licensed gun owners with a ‘collector' licence endorsement.53 55 56 Each automatic or restricted weapon must be registered to its owner, and disabled when not in use.

NZ guns are legal and 11 people were murdered out of 4million

I think this is proof that guns don't kill people: poor people with guns kill people.
 
Jhhnn said:
Oh please. Political candidates in Iran must pass muster with the religious Guardian Council, Voters have the same kind of choices as in the Republican Presidential Primary- Right, Far Right, & Fringewhack.

The Netherlands isn't a Constitutional Monarchy, a Democracy, much like the UK? Funny that-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_the_Netherlands
Click to expand...

I gave you the context regarding the Netherlands and you ignored it. You really lost the argument as evidenced by your need to respond by changing my statements into what you wanted me to say.

We have Guardian Councils too. They are the RNC and DNC and no one has a chance unless they pass muster. You love that. No chance for people to have real choice and you'd not have it any other way. I think you'd fit in comfortability with Guardian Councils

Why do you bother arguing if you can't even address the issue?
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
I gave you the context regarding the Netherlands and you ignored it. You really lost the argument as evidenced by your need to respond by changing my statements into what you wanted me to say.

We have Guardian Councils too. They are the RNC and DNC and no one has a chance unless they pass muster. You love that. No chance for people to have real choice and you'd not have it any other way. I think you'd fit in comfortability with Guardian Councils

Why do you bother arguing if you can't even address the issue?
Click to expand...

So, uhh, the RNC & the DNC are the same as the Guardian Council? Really? That it takes their approval to get your name on the ballot?

Funny that- I recall having a lot more choices than that. Maybe I was hallucinating, or maybe you're reaching very, very far to make some sort of point that avoids your anti-democracy statements.
 
Jhhnn said:
So, uhh, the RNC & the DNC are the same as the Guardian Council? Really? That it takes their approval to get your name on the ballot?

Funny that- I recall having a lot more choices than that. Maybe I was hallucinating, or maybe you're reaching very, very far to make some sort of point that avoids your anti-democracy statements.
Click to expand...

Yes you are drugs.

You can't win without the blessing of the DNC or RNC.

For the rest we're having a good laugh. I think your support of sex with preeteens is disgusting though.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top