Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
CLINTON NOR KERRY NEVER INSTIGATED A PRE EMPTIVE WAR AGAINST A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY THAT COST THE LIVES OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE AND HUNDREDS OF SOLDIERS UNDER THE PRETENSE OF THAT COUNTRY'S LINKS TO AL QAEDA (WHICH THERE WERE NONE) AND THE THREAT OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (WHICH THERE WERE NONE EITHER).
Read that part again, carefully. Pssst I dont think it's sinking in yet.
What year is this? 2003? What year did Clinton bomb Iraq? 1998? Any stocks of Chemical or biological agents between now and then could have long expired.
Clinton very well could have destroyed Weappons of mass destruction,
I don't know... But they certaintly arent there now
Thirteenth quarterly report of the Executive Chairman of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission in accordance with paragraph 12 of Security Council resolution 1284 (1999)
30 May 2003United Nations Security Council
13. Again, with respect to anthrax, the Commission, as it reported, had strong
indications ? but not conclusive evidence ? that all the quantities produced had
not been destroyed, and that hence even today such quantities could remain
In addition, photographic evidence shows that R-400A bombs had been located at Al Walid
Airbase in October 1991. This contradicts the declaration by Iraq that R-400A bombs had only
been deployed to Al Azzizziyah and Airfield 37 and that all such bombs had been destroyed in
July or August 1991.
Through sampling of excavated bombs at Al Azzizziyah in 1997, UNSCOM found botulinum
toxin in an R-400 bomb. Iraq had never declared that it had filled R-400 bombs with this agent.
Sampling of R-400 chemical bombs did confirm the presence of the alcohol component for
binary Sarin/Cyclosarin.
As it has proved impossible to verify the production and destruction details of R-400 bombs,
UNMOVIC cannot discount the possibility that some CW and BW filled R-400 bombs remain in
Iraq.
seems the UN wasnt so sure they were not still there.....