Whenever the news posts about "White People With Guns" its usually scary or weird or monstrously stupid.

[Lost_in_the_HTTP]

Make a new plan Stan:

McCloskeys Face Law Suspension After 2020 Incident With BLM Protestors

The request argues that the couple showed "indifference to public safety" and "moral turpitude" when they brandished guns against protestors.

www.newsweek.com

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2021-09-20/court-asked-to-suspend-law-licenses-of-gun-waving-couple

 

[blackangst1]

edit: sorry, probably would derail the thread.

 

[ElFenix]

weird + monstrously stupid:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439365285199302657

 

[JEDIYoda]

edit: sorry, probably would derail the thread.

GO AHEAD...YOUR MERE PRESENCE WOULD DERAIL ANY TREAD...LOLOL

 

[shortylickens]

Make a new plan Stan:

McCloskeys Face Law Suspension After 2020 Incident With BLM Protestors

The request argues that the couple showed "indifference to public safety" and "moral turpitude" when they brandished guns against protestors.

www.newsweek.com

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2021-09-20/court-asked-to-suspend-law-licenses-of-gun-waving-couple

Gun-toting McCloskeys could lose law licenses

The St. Louis couple who brandished weapons while staring down Black Lives Matter demonstrators in the summer of 2020 could lose their law licenses.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

They will probably keep their guns AND blame the fucking Democrats for everything that happened.

 

[Lost_in_the_HTTP]

But seriously folks, if indifference to the public and morality could cost someone a law license, would there be anyone with a law license?

 

[blankslate]

case in point...

it shown before it bears repeating imho.

the person pointing the weapon really should have had his ass beaten by everyone else at the range.


____________

 

[shortylickens]

case in point...

it shown before it bears repeating imho.

the person pointing the weapon really should have had his ass beaten by everyone else at the range.


____________

thats interesting but has nothing to do with this thread.

this thread is about a racist old couple that deliberately threatened protestors. the only question is whether the protestors had a legal right to be marching where they were.
EVEN IF they didnt have the right to march, the racist couple had no need to threaten them with firearms. They were in absolutely no danger, neither was their property.

 

[blankslate]

monstrously stupid... the words in the title fit what happened.



_______________

 

[JEDI]

Make a new plan Stan:

McCloskeys Face Law Suspension After 2020 Incident With BLM Protestors

The request argues that the couple showed "indifference to public safety" and "moral turpitude" when they brandished guns against protestors.

www.newsweek.com

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2021-09-20/court-asked-to-suspend-law-licenses-of-gun-waving-couple

State Supreme court denies appeals but..

Supreme Court denies appeal over law licenses from gun-waving Missouri couple

The Supreme Court denied a bid by a Missouri couple who potentially face indefinite suspension of their law licenses after they carried guns outside their home as protesters for racial justice marched in summer 2020.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Missouri's Supreme Court decided to suspend their licenses indefinitely in February but stayed the suspensions and put the lawyers on probation for one year with conditions including quarterly reports to a probation monitor in addition to 100 hours of free legal services.

The McCloskeys argued in the appeal to the highest court in the nation that the Missouri Supreme Court violated their Second Amendment as well as due process rights.


so they'll be practicing again in a year

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Sounds like a fair-ish ruling to me