When will we see Fury reviews?

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Samwell

Senior member
May 10, 2015
225
47
101
So we will see Fiji take no hit to performance when Enhanced Godrays is turned on as it has the tesselation improvements of Tonga. Moreover Fiji is a bandwidth and fill rate monster so expect some amazing results at 4K and even 1440p at times.

You can't take such a conclusion out of what you posted. If the architecture diagram is right, then we have Tongas Front end in Fiji, but with massively more Shader Power. If the Front end would be doubled like everything else, then you would be right, but unfortunately it seems not. We don't know whether other improvements were made. This is for me the only question mark, which might limit Fury a bit. Shader are up 45%, Bandwight ist good and Rops also won't limit. But Front end didn't scale from Tonga, so will be interesting whether it might be a limit.
 

gamervivek

Senior member
Jan 17, 2011
490
53
91
The front end has been improved compared to Tonga,

Fiji also improves upon what we first saw in Tonga. It can do as many theoretical primitives per clock (4) as Tonga, but AMD has improved the geometry engine so that the end result will be faster than what we have seen previously.

http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/AMD-Exposes-Fiji-World-HBM-Enthusiast/Fiji-GPU

And GM200 didn't double it either, in fact it's even slower than GM204 at polygon throughput.

http://techreport.com/review/27969/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-x-graphics-card-reviewed/3
 

Samwell

Senior member
May 10, 2015
225
47
101
That's why i wrote, we don't know what other optimizations are there.

GM200 is starting from a way higher level and when i look here everything and also triangle output is higher than GM204:
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/933-4/performances-theoriques-geometrie.html

Tongas Front-End actually is in many parts on the Level of Hawaii and not stronger. The big improvement in Tonga from Hawaii is the way higher tessalation power at high tesselation levels.
 

gamervivek

Senior member
Jan 17, 2011
490
53
91
There are optimizations though.

GM200 does do more triangles per clock, so it has scaled with other parts as well, it seems to be getting limited in those benchmarks then.
Those hardware.fr numbers came up on b3d, strange to see tonga falling behind with tahiti with culled triangles in tessellation performance. With the release of the recent driver that pushes 390X to higher tessellation performance even that impressive improvement now looks not that worthwhile.
 

ddarko

Senior member
Jun 18, 2006
264
3
81
Broadwell H = Fury

Neither can be bought and reviews are sparse to nonexistent.

Yes, very keen observation; it is very mysterious that a product that is not on sale yet can't be bought nor has been reviewed.

Also, the sky is blue and water is wet.
 
Last edited: