You're in no position to be saying who is the airhead. The thread is about swapping transmissions with the former having shorter gearing, therefore a better chance of climbing a hill vs. the latter transmission having taller gearing and therefore a worse chance of climbing a hill. The transmission that comes with the car can't climb the hill in 3rd gear (maybe it can if I have it revved to its peak torque) but CAN do it fairly easily in 2nd gear. Yes I'm aware I can ascend the hill in 1st gear, but the better question is, if I put in this "new" transmission, will I still be able to ascend the hill in 2nd gear?
I don't know, but I'm going to try and find out by doing some calculations and get some insight by someone with something more than snarky comments.
Everything is relative, some people consider 20mpg "good" I consider it "awful" some consider 40mpg "amazing" I consider it "ok"... It isn't THAT loud but it's definitely unnecessarily loud especially considering that all I'm doing is cruising.. Also I happen to have an exhaust system on this car (came with it) so it tends to amplify certain RPM ranges.. Anyway a hell of a lot more air is being sucked into the engine and consequently being burned at 2600rpm than at 2100rpm. If I want to accelerate, I could always shift into 4th gear and that would still have a lower rev (about 100rpm less) than when I'm in 5th gear.
To give you an idea of how I drive in the city, I typically go 1st->2nd->4th(20mph)->5th(25mph). The annoying part about city driving is that I find myself needing to shift while in the middle of the intersection.