- Oct 30, 2000
- 42,591
- 5
- 0
It is a shame that they were killed.Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
And if you were so concerned, you would stop trying to justify the terrosists actions of deliberately putting the civilians at risk
When and where did I do that? Your debate technique has now been reduced to shameless lying - pathetic.
You are getting like Kyle. Congrats.
Hamas pokes Isreal, knowing that poking Israel will generate a retaliation.
Hamas hides amoung the civilian population
Hamas expects that Israel will coming for the terrorists
Hamas hopes for a good PR opportunity.
Hamas does not shed a tear for the civilians that they ensure get caught up in across fire.
But acording to the Hamas supporters:
This is Ok - because Israel should turn the other cheek and let Hamas and their terrorist buddies continue to lob rockets at Israel.
Israel should not come after the "freedom" fighters.
It is all Israel's fault for not allowing the Arab nations to exterminate here every time the Arabs had a hard on.
Did Israel launch shells and fire bullets that killed approximately 200 children in the slaughter than began last December?
Israel says they did:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...-in-Gaza-campaign.html
You argue that Hamas forced Israel to commit these atrocities, I argue that no provocation justifies almost 200 dead children, amongst a total of 309 dead civilians, according to Israeli estimates, which are obviously as biased and as twisted as your little mind.
Show where Israel deliberately targeted them or planned to?
Where were Hamas and the militants/terrorists during the tragedy?
Had Hamas not provoked Israel by encouraging the increased shelling and/or participating in it, then Israel would not havel aunched the attack.
Hamas knew that Israel would react when they started that phase.