3chordcharlie
Diamond Member
- Mar 30, 2004
- 9,859
- 1
- 81
I understand and sympathize with your position.Originally posted by: Thorny
Sorry, I guess I didn't catch your point, I wasn't trying to dodge it. I know that ED requires payment, but that doesn't make it any more acceptable to me. I'm just saying that if the landowner doesn't wish to part with thier land that the government shouldn't be able to take it from you.
What I was getting at was that if I felt the government actually needed my land, I would probably not contest ED. But if it wasn't going to be used for some extremely good purpose I would not care to part with it. Some of my family's land has been in the family for over 150 years and I'll be damned if they thing they are going take it away involuntarily, payment or not.
Not to sound like a hippie here, but what I was implying was that the land used to belong to natives on this continent. I'm not sure if the US history is quite as bad as Canada's, but we essentially stole the country and refuse to live up even to the wildly unfair treaties that we did sign.