Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 35,729
- 10,034
- 136
I only have this: https://arstechnica.com/science/202...me-an-endangered-species-a-million-years-ago/Uh, there is only an abstract there. Do you have access to the full article somehow?
Didn't read the link above did ya'?Just now, we are beginning to learn that plastic, which has contaminated everything water can touch, is found in all our organs and at the very least, causes a form of dementia to progress.
You sure can. I have a feeling it's all gonna be ok. You just wait and see.Can I borrow some?
Do not go gentle into that good night,I am fully and completely positively optimistic that every living thing on Earth will die.
I've seen video of Carlin delivering that spiel onstage, probably more than once. Look, George worked up his routines in advance. He'd dream them up in his head, take notes, continue working on them, revise, work parts into his very frequent shows. Eventually a lot of these ideas/themes became major schticks for his performances, and this is just one example. Realize, this man was a performer. He made his ample living in this way. He WAS NOT A SCIENTIST. A lot of his conclusions display laziness. A lot of the time he's pressing your buttons as an audience member. This schtick (in my quoted link) is so full of holes it's ridiculous. Partly he's trying to justify his lack of ability or desire to dig deeper into the environmental movement. I'm sick of this I'm sick of that. It suits him better to just do a big fuck you to it. That's George. People get that way a lot of times because they don't have the energy or time or motivation to dig into stuff. A lot of times it's because it clashes with their personal situations.Y'all REALLY need to read the rant by George Carlin .....
.
Well, it's been touted as a fundamental to keep in mind, and I don't disagree. If I ever have a doubt I think on this:I am fully and completely positively optimistic that every living thing on Earth will die.
You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. - Harlan EllisonNawh, in this, he was dead nuts on.
In any circumstance where humans still exist in 5 billion years, we will most certainly not be on our origin planet anymore.Well, it's been touted as a fundamental to keep in mind, and I don't disagree. If I ever have a doubt I think on this:
1) We likely will never figure out a way to move our species in a sustainable means from planet earth.
2) Planet earth will be destroyed when our sun becomes a red giant.
Of course the chances that humans will get obliterated by 2) are slim. It's very likely to happen before. But 1 + 2 = permanent extinction for humanity.
What we need to do is consume more outwards instead of inwards... Therefor to the Moon Mars Europa, to the Stars. Lets get busy building this technology. More AI. It's gonna be OK!Honestly, I can't for the life of me, figure out why people hate their own species so much that they wish for us to die off; or to never have existed.
For me, it's because humans destabilize otherwise stable, natural systems. When they do, those systems become dependent on humans to maintain them, which we inevitably fail to do. It's innately an abusive relationship that we force upon the natural world.Honestly, I can't for the life of me, figure out why people hate their own species so much that they wish for us to die off; or to never have existed.
Yeah, I don't get that either. I can be misanthropic as hell but I'm not dumb enough to write off the whole human race. The upside is limitless, people.Honestly, I can't for the life of me, figure out why people hate their own species so much that they wish for us to die off; or to never have existed.
No offense, that view point sounds like an incredibly sheltered life.Honestly, I can't for the life of me, figure out why people hate their own species so much that they wish for us to die off; or to never have existed.
Except youThere are NO advantages to the human parasite.
One could argue, pretty easily from a scientific perspective, that we are a product of nature. I suppose, that by analogy, we are the most effective 'virus' nature has ever created. Practically nothing is immune to our ability to enter the life of a host, take it over and consume it's resources, and then kill it or leave it compromised. We do have a weakness. We ignore the very things we create that are poisonous to us and only act after significant damage has already been done (leaded gas, PFASs, etc). Now, faced with the prospect of losing 10s or 100s of millions of lives a year in the future do to climate change - we are just beginning to act. By our nature, many of our species impede the necessary changes to save ourselves and protect our environment and the food chain that we need to live.For me, it's because humans destabilize otherwise stable, natural systems. When they do, those systems become dependent on humans to maintain them, which we inevitably fail to do. It's innately an abusive relationship that we force upon the natural world.
That's not unique to humans. A similar circumstance happened during the great oxygenation event, led to the first mass extinction of our planet. They at least get credit for not understanding how any of this shit works; we should know better.One could argue, pretty easily from a scientific perspective, that we are a product of nature. I suppose, that by analogy, we are the most effective 'virus' nature has ever created. Practically nothing is immune to our ability to enter the life of a host, take it over and consume it's resources, and then kill it or leave it compromised. We do have a weakness. We ignore the very things we create that are poisonous to us and only act after significant damage has already been done (leaded gas, PFASs, etc). Now, faced with the prospect of losing 10s or 100s of millions of lives a year in the future do to climate change - we are just beginning to act. By our nature, many of our species impede the necessary changes to save ourselves and protect our environment and the food chain that we need to live.
I think you overestimate how good it can still be, and underestimate how bad it can get, as well as how much 'time' we actually have. We had time a century ago, we had time to avoid the worst of it 50 years ago (that was 1973, as a reminder). Now? We are very probably past the point of no return, we're just waiting to watch it happen. In all likelihood, humans will spend another half a decade waffling about russia, china, (and for us) fighting over presidents going to jail (while still burning fossil fuels at increasing rates), the next 5 waffling about the UK returning to the EU, more china, energy security, and legislation surrounding electrifying cars as well as securing limited resource for battery materials (while still burning fossil fuels at increasing rates) The next 10 years focusing internally on ever increasing effects from climate change (wildfires, flooding, ever worse heat events, ever worse blizzards, ever worse droughts, emergence of consistent wet bulb event summers across the tropics) .... (while still burning fossil fuels at increasing rates), The following 10 realizing we've actually, no really fucked the ecosystem and starting to really consider geoengineering possibilities, SpaceX takes it upon themselves to launch a solar swarm to limit the amount of light reaching earth, resulting in our very own Kessler syndrome, meanwhile mass migrations (leading to armed border conflicts worldwide) and famine result in billions dead (while still burning fossil fuels at finally precipitating rates, on account of all the dead people). That's my prediction at any rate.I'm confident, that as things get worse, more and more people will see the reality of global warming and demand change. Belatedly, but in time to prevent the absolute worst of it. We will blow by several of the targets set by climate scientists. Again, I think that by our nature, we are slow to react because historically we've been able to move to a different land, or exert control over our environment in a way to protect ourselves. It's only when too many of our tribe have been killed and eaten by tigers that we summon the courage to create a hunting party to kill the ones that have a taste for human flesh.