• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

When did work computers become a place for family photos?

Juddog

Diamond Member
People I work with seem to have this idea that their work computer is their personal family photo storage unit. Computers crash and come in, and it seems they care more about their family photos, parties, and movies, than they do about their business documents.

Anybody else notice this trend?
 
Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Your company doesnt have a policy against storing excessive personal data on work computers?

honestly, as long as it's not on the network....

yah if we didnt let them store them on their local PC how else would we be able to snoop for blackmail...
 
Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Your company doesnt have a policy against storing excessive personal data on work computers?

honestly, as long as it's not on the network....

QFT...any business really shouldn't care if personal photos are stored on any workstation. It's the modern version of picture frames on one's desk in the past.

Now that said our policy is anything on the C: drive is not our responsibility should data be lost. We just deploy a new fresh imaged machine should hardware failure occur. We have a document on backing up one's favorites to our networked drives.

Out of the 40GB my workstation has 17GB of my pictures and mp3's. I had to turn off my sharing as associates were raiding my collection.
 
I dont care if they have photos on their machine, and I dont care if they lose them when the machine goes down. It is not even remotely my job to ensure the backup and recovery of your personal documents.
 
Originally posted by: yinan
Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Your company doesnt have a policy against storing excessive personal data on work computers?

honestly, as long as it's not on the network....

I couldnt agree more

Well, I've run into this myself, and it does get annoying when they are leaving, fired, laid off, and you are asked to burn 40GB+ in personal pictures or music for them. :thumbsdown:
 
Originally posted by: amdhunter
Originally posted by: yinan
Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Your company doesnt have a policy against storing excessive personal data on work computers?

honestly, as long as it's not on the network....

I couldnt agree more

Well, I've run into this myself, and it does get annoying when they are leaving, fired, laid off, and you are asked to burn 40GB+ in personal pictures or music for them. :thumbsdown:

Looks like you have a problem saying no 😛
Just tell them to f off, you're not going to see them anymore, anyway.
 
Heheh interesting responses. Our policy is pretty much the same as what's listed above; the company doesn't really care if an employee stores pictures on their PC as long as it's not on a network drive, and it's their loss if the hard drive dies or the computer gets stolen.

I just noticed that the users seem to be more and more concerned when their hard drive does die of the pictures more than anything else; you would think they would burn it to a DVD and keep it at home instead of solely on their work computer.
 
I think it depends on the company you work for. Being that I started at the bank in 1991 when all we had was dummy terminals hooked up to a few AS/400 mainframe computers, I was there to watch the evolution into Wintel boxes. I was also there to test the limits and watch policies evolve as more and more computer savvy users started to use the system.

In the early days (1993-1995) you had unlimited access to all network drives, all personal folders, all company documents, everything. If it was on the network, you had access. And I did revel in roaming around. After Windows 95 came out, we switched to a more controlled Novell environment. You could still run everything but now certain servers were restricted.

By 1998 with the year 2000 bug looming and machines being fitted with even more security policies with the advent of Win98, you now could only access your own personal or department data on the network, with unlimited use of your C drive.

By the time I left the company, the only people that had hard drives were people that needed them (and you had to really justify it). Over 90% of our 1000 users had tiny network terminals running crippled versions of Windows CE with no user supplied data ports / storage. Alot of that had to do with controlling access, storage and copying capability of digitized documents of sensitive customer loan and banking data (to comply with new more stringent bank secrecy, consumer privacy and data security laws that exposed the company to a high degree of liability).

 
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Your company doesnt have a policy against storing excessive personal data on work computers?

honestly, as long as it's not on the network....

QFT...any business really shouldn't care if personal photos are stored on any workstation. It's the modern version of picture frames on one's desk in the past.

Now that said our policy is anything on the C: drive is not our responsibility should data be lost. We just deploy a new fresh imaged machine should hardware failure occur. We have a document on backing up one's favorites to our networked drives.

Out of the 40GB my workstation has 17GB of my pictures and mp3's. I had to turn off my sharing as associates were raiding my collection.

That is the policy here as well but the reality is that I will do everything in my power to try and retrieve their stuff off of a drive before imaging/replacing a workstation. We do emphasize to them that before they leave for summer break it is very important for them to backup anything on the machine they expect to be there when school starts in September and they are used to it now. The one area they give me static about is the network storage but I am determined to not let it become an ever increasing dump site for data so they are told that they must move anything they wish to keep off of there before leaving for the summer as I will be deleting the folders as part of preparation for the new school year.
 
Yea, I don't understand that thinking. Anything I've ever kept on a work computer has been a duplicate of data I already had. I have no problem wiping my personal data off of a machine. It can be put back easily enough.
 
I think it's understandable from their point of view (and I'm a sys admin FWIW) that most people spend more time at work than with their families or at home.

In that regard, I can understand it.

For me, I'm always "on call" in the sense that if something breaks or if someone on the opposite coast of the country needs something then I'm the guy and need to take care of it so I do spend my personal time working and my working time doing personal stuff a lot.
 
Originally posted by: meltdown75
I have this idea that you should CRY MOAR

I'm not the one crying, the users who lose 2 years worth of family photos when their hard drive dies because they never bothered to copy their photos to their home computer or backup to DVD are. I'm just making an observation LOL.

It doesn't affect me whatsoever if someone loses photos of their family and they didn't back it up.
 
I do have some personal photos and whatnot on my computer, but all the important stuff is also on my home PC, so if I lose the hard drive at work I don't lose anything valuable. I also have it all under one folder, so it is easy to stick in a DVD and burn it if I want to move it (or erase it).
 
Back
Top