- Sep 6, 2000
- 25,383
- 1,013
- 126
Seeing the abject panic setting in over the federal government being forced to deal with a slightly reduced growth rate in spending is rather amusing. The only problem is that like an appetizer at an avant-garde restaurant, it's not nearly enough to satisfy. Like Lays potato chips, you can't have just one, so who's up for the next sequester (or 10)? How many do you think we should have, considering the original represents about 1/44th of the budget? Keep in mind we're spending 1/3 more now than we did five years ago ($2.9T in FY09 vs $3.803 for FY13) so don't be shy with taking a second helping, not like we're going to run out.