Whats with the easy to kill aliens in Sci-fi shooters?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Raduque

Lifer
Aug 22, 2004
13,140
138
106
Man, the aliens in Crysis ARE difficult. Those shard guns or whatever walk right over you, and they take mags upon mags of ammo to kill.
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
Come on man. Haven't you seen Independence Day? Without shields a mid 80s fighter jet can take down "fighter jets" from aliens thousands of years ahead of us.

That's like a byplane taking down a raptor x 100.

And hey, a mid 90s Mac Computer can overcome the security systems of an entire mothership and then blow it the fuck up.

Technology isn't always beneficial.
There was an episode of Stargate SG1 where Apophis has a shield which stops all the bullets and staff weapons and everything else the SG1 team fires at him.
How do they defeat him? With a knife, because the technology protected against fast moving projectiles, but a slow moving knife could get through.

Sure, it's a made up situation, but then so is all of this. It just shows that advanced technology isn't always great since it might be designed to combat advanced weapons, rather than things like the projectile weapons of humans.

And as I've already said in the Mass Effect case, humans aren't thousands of years behind all the aliens, since we're sharing the same technology and working with aliens.
 

lord_emperor

Golden Member
Nov 4, 2009
1,380
1
0
Technology for destruction advances faster than that for protection. Realistically the armor a human-sized creature is capable of wearing cannot protect against purpose-made munitions, i.e. armor piercing bullets, even if "only" chemically propelled.

Energy shields in the Star Wars / Star Trek sense may not even be possible, or would have such power requirements that using them on a personal level is impossible.

So, bullets could probably kill aliens.

Now the alien weapons on the other hand, I would expect to be at the least gauss or rail guns, and fire projectiles at relativistic speeds. There is no way we could protect ourselves against that, let alone any sort of portable energy weapon.

Or more likely they'd just kill us with gamma rays from orbit.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Technology isn't always beneficial.
There was an episode of Stargate SG1 where Apophis has a shield which stops all the bullets and staff weapons and everything else the SG1 team fires at him.
How do they defeat him? With a knife, because the technology protected against fast moving projectiles, but a slow moving knife could get through.

Sure, it's a made up situation, but then so is all of this. It just shows that advanced technology isn't always great since it might be designed to combat advanced weapons, rather than things like the projectile weapons of humans.

And as I've already said in the Mass Effect case, humans aren't thousands of years behind all the aliens, since we're sharing the same technology and working with aliens.

wow, what a total ripoff of Dune!
 

AndroidVageta

Banned
Mar 22, 2008
2,421
0
0
Technology for destruction advances faster than that for protection. Realistically the armor a human-sized creature is capable of wearing cannot protect against purpose-made munitions, i.e. armor piercing bullets, even if "only" chemically propelled.

Energy shields in the Star Wars / Star Trek sense may not even be possible, or would have such power requirements that using them on a personal level is impossible.

So, bullets could probably kill aliens.

Now the alien weapons on the other hand, I would expect to be at the least gauss or rail guns, and fire projectiles at relativistic speeds. There is no way we could protect ourselves against that, let alone any sort of portable energy weapon.

Or more likely they'd just kill us with gamma rays from orbit.

You seem to be basing all your ideas based on what our current and near future technology can do. If aliens are 1000's or maybe millions of years more advanced than we are their technology for powering small personal devices could be on such a scale that we couldnt even comprehend it. They could have a power cell the size of a button battery that could power Las Vegas for years...I mean, we just dont know. So saying that something like a personal force field or having armor that couldnt stop a armor piercing bullet is just ridiculous, theoretically speaking.

I mean, look at all the technology we have now that just 50 - 60 years ago was thought to be IMPOSSIBLE...like space travel or all the advancements weve made in the medical field, etc, etc...now imagine where we could be a 1000 years from now...a MILLION years from now...even the most forward thinking minds in the field of science and technology would not even recognize us.

Plus, just the fact that they can travel 100's, 1000's, or even millions+ light years just shows that they obviously have technology far beyond what we could even imagine.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,805
6,361
126
You seem to be basing all your ideas based on what our current and near future technology can do. If aliens are 1000's or maybe millions of years more advanced than we are their technology for powering small personal devices could be on such a scale that we couldnt even comprehend it. They could have a power cell the size of a button battery that could power Las Vegas for years...I mean, we just dont know. So saying that something like a personal force field or having armor that couldnt stop a armor piercing bullet is just ridiculous, theoretically speaking.

I mean, look at all the technology we have now that just 50 - 60 years ago was thought to be IMPOSSIBLE...like space travel or all the advancements weve made in the medical field, etc, etc...now imagine where we could be a 1000 years from now...a MILLION years from now...even the most forward thinking minds in the field of science and technology would not even recognize us.

Plus, just the fact that they can travel 100's, 1000's, or even millions+ light years just shows that they obviously have technology far beyond what we could even imagine.

That might give them the ability to transport your Molecules into another Dimension, but it doesn't prevent them from bleeding to death from a high velocity piece of Lead.
 

Magusigne

Golden Member
Nov 21, 2007
1,550
0
76
Read Allen Dean Foster's Book of the Damned Series.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Damned_Trilogy

After the Weave scouts convince volunteers (mercenaries) from Earth to join the war, the tide turns for the Weave and the main conflict towards the end of the series becomes a question of what will happen to the new warriors when the war finally ends if they have not become more civilized (and therefore, less effective allies). Throughout the book the humans are greatly feared by the rest of the Weave, because of the human race's violent tendencies (the rest of the galaxy's species lived in harmony amongst themselves before they developed enough to reach out into space).
 

dighn

Lifer
Aug 12, 2001
22,820
4
81
Read Allen Dean Foster's Book of the Damned Series.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Damned_Trilogy

After the Weave scouts convince volunteers (mercenaries) from Earth to join the war, the tide turns for the Weave and the main conflict towards the end of the series becomes a question of what will happen to the new warriors when the war finally ends if they have not become more civilized (and therefore, less effective allies). Throughout the book the humans are greatly feared by the rest of the Weave, because of the human race's violent tendencies (the rest of the galaxy's species lived in harmony amongst themselves before they developed enough to reach out into space).

Well, setting aside the question of how believable such a scenario is, the aliens in your typical game are clearly not shy of using violence.

Why are we arguing about this anyway? While storytelling has become increasingly more important in games, ultimately it is game play that dictates how the in-game universe works.
 

Magusigne

Golden Member
Nov 21, 2007
1,550
0
76
Well, setting aside the question of how believable such a scenario is, the aliens in your typical game are clearly not shy of using violence.

Why are we arguing about this anyway? While storytelling has become increasingly more important in games, ultimately it is game play that dictates how the in-game universe works.

Maybe the Aliens from AvP are just Culinary experts that were searching for rare spices when they came upon humans destroying their broodlings.
 

Liet

Golden Member
Jun 9, 2001
1,529
0
0
I read a fun science fiction short story where aliens are scouting Earth for possible invasion, and all they see on TV and entertainment is us killing aliens. They decide we're obviously giving military training to our young at birth and decide to leave us alone.
 

lord_emperor

Golden Member
Nov 4, 2009
1,380
1
0
You seem to be basing all your ideas based on what our current and near future technology can do. If aliens are 1000's or maybe millions of years more advanced than we are their technology for powering small personal devices could be on such a scale that we couldnt even comprehend it. They could have a power cell the size of a button battery that could power Las Vegas for years...I mean, we just dont know. So saying that something like a personal force field or having armor that couldnt stop a armor piercing bullet is just ridiculous, theoretically speaking.

I mean, look at all the technology we have now that just 50 - 60 years ago was thought to be IMPOSSIBLE...like space travel or all the advancements weve made in the medical field, etc, etc...now imagine where we could be a 1000 years from now...a MILLION years from now...even the most forward thinking minds in the field of science and technology would not even recognize us.

Plus, just the fact that they can travel 100's, 1000's, or even millions+ light years just shows that they obviously have technology far beyond what we could even imagine.

Well, imagine where we were 1000 years ago, we were stabbing eachother with swords.

As far as I know we can still be killed by swords, even while wearing kevlar and ceramic armor, because it's not practical to armor a soldier against bullets and melee weapons. That would just be too heavy and expensive.

Now if you set a squad of modern soldiers with assault rifles against some medieval swordsmen, the guys with guns would likely be victorious however there still remains a chance that one of the swordsmen will land a telling blow.

The question then becomes one of scale. When in their technological advancement do these aliens decide to fly over to earth and start trouble?

In theory humans could travel to another star right now. Japan has tested a solar sail and I'm sure with sufficient investment we could send some kind of radiation shielded box off into the sky to arrive in a few thousand years.

The way I see it though the aliens will either be relatively close to us, in which case we get hollywood style fights, or they're so far advanced they just selectively toast us from orbit.
 

PhatoseAlpha

Platinum Member
Apr 10, 2005
2,131
21
81
Look, it's real simple. Any time a species with aggressive tendencies reach the point of FTL travel, the Shivans emerge from subspace and annihilate them. This is why no one is powerful enough to kill us.



More pragmatically, the simple reality is that any species sufficiently advanced enough that we're no threat is also sufficiently advanced enough to not want to hang out with us. We're wasps to them - yeah, no real threat, kind of annoying, and they could wipe us out with no trouble. But as long as we ain't trying to build nests in their living room, why bother?
 
Last edited:

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,087
3,598
126
Simply because humans are making the games not the aliens. We are supposed to triumph.

+1

And if worse comes to worse, we can steal at least 1 gun from the aliens and use it against them.

Well in most Sci Fi shooters, you always have the options to take 1 of the aliens weapons.
 

TheStu

Moderator<br>Mobile Devices & Gadgets
Moderator
Sep 15, 2004
12,089
45
91
Technology isn't always beneficial.
There was an episode of Stargate SG1 where Apophis has a shield which stops all the bullets and staff weapons and everything else the SG1 team fires at him.
How do they defeat him? With a knife, because the technology protected against fast moving projectiles, but a slow moving knife could get through.

Sure, it's a made up situation, but then so is all of this. It just shows that advanced technology isn't always great since it might be designed to combat advanced weapons, rather than things like the projectile weapons of humans.

And as I've already said in the Mass Effect case, humans aren't thousands of years behind all the aliens, since we're sharing the same technology and working with aliens.

Using another Stargate example, the replicators were a highly feared robotic 'race' that would consume everything in their path. The most advanced and powerful species in 2 (maybe 3) galaxies, the Asgard could barely hold them off since the replicators were shielded against all energy weapons. You know what they weren't shielded against? Little bits of metal that were explosively fired at them.

Or using the Harry Turtledove series 'In the Balance' as an example. Aliens come to Earth during WWII, and brought an invasion fleet with them. In this instance, the alien civilization was actually fairly slow to develop, and when they had last observed Earth, 1000 years prior, decided that it was an easy target and launched their fleet. What they found instead was WWII technology, which was impervious to most of their tactics. Their shields were worthless against slow moving projectiles (such as cannons), their EMPs didn't work against our fighters, and although their vehicles and weapons were much more powerful and they could kill 10 tanks for every loss, we could build 15 tanks to their 1.

Sometimes you just have to throw wave after wave of your own men at the problem.
 

VulgarDisplay

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2009
6,188
2
76
+1

And if worse comes to worse, we can steal at least 1 gun from the aliens and use it against them.

Well in most Sci Fi shooters, you always have the options to take 1 of the aliens weapons.

"Since when did the humans get themselves a mother fuckin' freeze ray?"
 

TwinsenTacquito

Senior member
Apr 1, 2010
821
0
0
I think it's realistic when you're talking about the best soldier we have to offer and some aliens stacking crates somewhere.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
advanced technology doesn't necessarily make you immune to a bullet through whatever makes up your brain
 

mooncancook

Platinum Member
May 28, 2003
2,874
50
91
Because the human race just excels at war. That's why no alien race has invaded us yet, they know when it comes to war we are badass
 

xCxStylex

Senior member
Apr 6, 2003
710
0
0
Dude. This is like, some Kevin Costner movie or some shit, I think it was "The Last Samurai" or something.

The Japanese guys with horses and swords know they have no chance against the whiteys with guns, but they fight them anyway.

lol

Well, imagine where we were 1000 years ago, we were stabbing eachother with swords.

As far as I know we can still be killed by swords, even while wearing kevlar and ceramic armor, because it's not practical to armor a soldier against bullets and melee weapons. That would just be too heavy and expensive.

Now if you set a squad of modern soldiers with assault rifles against some medieval swordsmen, the guys with guns would likely be victorious however there still remains a chance that one of the swordsmen will land a telling blow.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
We are thousands of years ahead of sharks in technology, but people still get killed by them.
 
Last edited:

bunnyfubbles

Lifer
Sep 3, 2001
12,248
3
0
We are thousands of years ahead of sharks in technology, but people still get killed by them.

but we're also millions of years behind them in terms of evolution :p

In this analogy sharks kill humans because they were looking for food, not a fight, and the human was likely just in the wrong place at the wrong time not looking to actually engage themselves with a shark.

In media with humans vs. aliens, the aliens are usually violent aggressors, to equate that back to the shark analogy, it would be like humans specifically declaring war on sharks yet the sharks would somehow beat us back to where we would lose our campaign.

Not possible, not only would we have 0 losses amongst forces specifically set out to kill sharks, we would likely use some sort of biological warefare against the sharks to the point where we wouldn't really have to personally kill any of the sharks anyways...that is if we were to actually ever bother with such silly nonsense...

which is again yet another criticism of alien antagonists. Any aliens advanced enough to visit our planet would likely see us as dumb as we see ourselves in comparison to sharks and likely wouldn't even bother with us beyond basic familiarization like how we do with sharks...and just like sharks don't or cant even comprehend that we do such things, the same could be true of aliens in regards to us.
 

bunnyfubbles

Lifer
Sep 3, 2001
12,248
3
0
Using another Stargate example, the replicators were a highly feared robotic 'race' that would consume everything in their path. The most advanced and powerful species in 2 (maybe 3) galaxies, the Asgard could barely hold them off since the replicators were shielded against all energy weapons. You know what they weren't shielded against? Little bits of metal that were explosively fired at them.

Or using the Harry Turtledove series 'In the Balance' as an example. Aliens come to Earth during WWII, and brought an invasion fleet with them. In this instance, the alien civilization was actually fairly slow to develop, and when they had last observed Earth, 1000 years prior, decided that it was an easy target and launched their fleet. What they found instead was WWII technology, which was impervious to most of their tactics. Their shields were worthless against slow moving projectiles (such as cannons), their EMPs didn't work against our fighters, and although their vehicles and weapons were much more powerful and they could kill 10 tanks for every loss, we could build 15 tanks to their 1.

Sometimes you just have to throw wave after wave of your own men at the problem.

Zapp Brannigan - military genius

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_fJSsuBIks
 

JTsyo

Lifer
Nov 18, 2007
12,038
1,135
126
Come on man. Haven't you seen Independence Day? Without shields a mid 80s fighter jet can take down "fighter jets" from aliens thousands of years ahead of us.

That's like a byplane taking down a raptor x 100.

And hey, a mid 90s Mac Computer can overcome the security systems of an entire mothership and then blow it the fuck up.

If the bi-plane could line up shots on the raptor, the shots would go through. Same as how today's soldiers would die to poison darts from BC era.