postmortemIA
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2006
- 7,721
- 40
- 91
Originally posted by: Trevelyan
[
Turn a widescreen monitor sideways, and its the best for coding.
Nope, then there's no enough height. 3:4 might be good sideways, but 9:16 is definitely not.
Originally posted by: Trevelyan
[
Turn a widescreen monitor sideways, and its the best for coding.
Originally posted by: dgevert
Originally posted by: Job
That's BS tho - widescreen monitors are physically smaller than their standard counterparts - only bigger if what you're watching is without black bars. Went into a electronics store today just to look at TVs - the 20" widescreens seem so small compared to the 20" 4:3 screens - far less visually imposing.
Some people will never learn...you're one of those idiots who buys DVDs in "fullscreen" aren't you?
One word that won't ever be used to describe my 24" LCD is "small."
Originally posted by: dgevert
Originally posted by: Job
That's BS tho - widescreen monitors are physically smaller than their standard counterparts - only bigger if what you're watching is without black bars. Went into a electronics store today just to look at TVs - the 20" widescreens seem so small compared to the 20" 4:3 screens - far less visually imposing.
Some people will never learn...you're one of those idiots who buys DVDs in "fullscreen" aren't you?q]
Good God no! Why would anyone do that? That's just wrong. WS screens are smaller -
20" WS = roughly 1645cm2
20" FS = roughly 2162cm2
Get a 20" WS and a 20" FS next to each other. 20" WS is smaller. Your 24" screen would be even bigger if it were FS and I wouldn't say either were small
Originally posted by: dgevert
20" 4:3 = 1600x1200
24" 16:9 = 1920x1200
Making the 24" the widescreen equivalent of 20"...making the 20" 4:3 seem small.
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Nope. Just a "fish eye" view.
