Originally posted by: BurnItDwn
Originally posted by: jandrews
Originally posted by: BurnItDwn
Shouldn't be the "same" year round as that isn't as energy efficient. That said, in the winter, inside heat in the low 60s is warm enough for everyone.
In the summer, inside AC in the low 70s should be cool enough so that nobody is sweating uncomfortably.
Anything warmer than like 71 or 72 is unreasonable for an office environment where people are expected to wear long pants rather than shorts and a shirt with a collar and a tie rather than just a t-shirt.
That said, the heat is too high in here, it's probably like 72 or 73 in here, so I have to use a fan to keep cool. I have 2 fans, just in case ...
no, it isnt, thats the whole point, what you dictate is your opinion and it is not fact. Personally I like my apartment to be 72 in the winter and I pay the price for it. At 72 at home in the winter I am still in long sleeve shirts and pants lol. If anything I see people putting on more clothes at the office and not less.
Yes, I am of course dictating my opinion.
Also, what I am saying is that it's more cost effective to use the least amount of heat and the least amount of AC to make the most amount of people comfortable.
If it were strictly up to me, I would keep it about 60-65 degrees at 40-60% humidity year round, but in the summer, that's gonna be one hell of an electric bill, and in the winter it's infeasible to get the humidity that high (even with whole house humidifier.)
72 degrees to me, is too hot to be comfortable with my "office" clothes on (Slacks, undershirt, collared shirt with tie) unless I've got a fan blowing on my constantly.
That said, I live just a bit NW of Chicago, and I wear shorts all year long (though not at work since I have to wear long pants with my shirt and tie.) I only would wear long pants otherwise if the snow was higher than my ankles, sorta like how it is currently (have about 6 inches at my house.)