- Apr 6, 2002
- 7,141
- 1
- 0
This just occurred to me, laserdisc seems like the Betamax version of DVD, but I dunno. What are the differences?
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Tons.
For one, laserdisc video is not digital. The audio is digital though.
Viper GTS
Originally posted by: KingNothing
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Tons.
For one, laserdisc video is not digital. The audio is digital though.
Viper GTS
You mean the original source video that was recorded on the laserdisc was analog, right? Wouldn't it have to be in digital format on the laserdisc itself?
Originally posted by: KingNothing
So basically the video quality was the same as VHS but the audio was better?
No, the picture quality is much better than VHS.So basically the video quality was the same as VHS but the audio was better?
Originally posted by: Shiva112
I know laserdisc could do ac3 audio...but through an RF type connector. I don't know its compatible with today's standard decoders. Not sure of the capacity either, but I know the picture was close to DVD. Others are right though, the compression is the biggest difference between the two. Lack of compression made laserdiscs huge and expensive. Individual discs costed around $80-100.
Originally posted by: Muadib
Originally posted by: Shiva112
I know laserdisc could do ac3 audio...but through an RF type connector. I don't know its compatible with today's standard decoders. Not sure of the capacity either, but I know the picture was close to DVD. Others are right though, the compression is the biggest difference between the two. Lack of compression made laserdiscs huge and expensive. Individual discs costed around $80-100.
As far as digital sound goes, if your LDP had either a coax or toslink digital output then you are good as far as using it on todays equipment. The RF type connector seems to have followed the ldp into history.
