What's the difference between laserdisc and DVD?

KingNothing

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2002
7,141
1
0
This just occurred to me, laserdisc seems like the Betamax version of DVD, but I dunno. What are the differences?
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Tons.

For one, laserdisc video is not digital. The audio is digital though.

Some info

I had some links with TONS of info (in a previous ld vs dvd thread), but the links are dead now.

Viper GTS
 

KingNothing

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2002
7,141
1
0
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Tons.

For one, laserdisc video is not digital. The audio is digital though.

Viper GTS

You mean the original source video that was recorded on the laserdisc was analog, right? Wouldn't it have to be in digital format on the laserdisc itself?
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Originally posted by: KingNothing
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Tons.

For one, laserdisc video is not digital. The audio is digital though.

Viper GTS

You mean the original source video that was recorded on the laserdisc was analog, right? Wouldn't it have to be in digital format on the laserdisc itself?

No, I mean precisely what I said. The video on the laserdisc is not digital, it is analog. The audio is digital.

Viper GTS
 

cjchaps

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,013
1
81
DVD's compress the movie and it is stored as a movie datafile. Laserdiscs are like a film projector, in that a bunch of pictures are stored on the disc, and they are not comrpessed useing MPEG compression like DVD's.
 

FeathersMcGraw

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2001
4,041
1
0
Ignoring the obvious difference in form factor, laserdisc technology preceded home consumer DVD technology by at least a decade. It's essentially a legacy market at this point.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Originally posted by: KingNothing
So basically the video quality was the same as VHS but the audio was better?

It was better than VHS I believe. Better resolution(more lines drawn on the screen), as well as a cleaner souce - optical vs. magnetic.
 

cjchaps

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,013
1
81
Laserdisc quality rivals DVDs, and if the DVD was not encoded well, the laserdisc will surpass the DVD in picture quality, largely in part becaues the laserdisc video is not compressed.
 

Muadib

Lifer
May 30, 2000
18,127
912
126
The VHS format outputs 220 lines of horizontal resolution.
Broadcast TV has about 330 lines of horizontal resolution.
Laserdisc outputs just over 400 lines of horizontal resolution.
DVD outputs about 500 lines of horizontal resolution.
 

Maverick

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2000
5,900
0
76
I know laserdisc could do ac3 audio...but through an RF type connector. I don't know its compatible with today's standard decoders. Not sure of the capacity either, but I know the picture was close to DVD. Others are right though, the compression is the biggest difference between the two. Lack of compression made laserdiscs huge and expensive. Individual discs costed around $80-100.
 

Muadib

Lifer
May 30, 2000
18,127
912
126
Originally posted by: Shiva112
I know laserdisc could do ac3 audio...but through an RF type connector. I don't know its compatible with today's standard decoders. Not sure of the capacity either, but I know the picture was close to DVD. Others are right though, the compression is the biggest difference between the two. Lack of compression made laserdiscs huge and expensive. Individual discs costed around $80-100.

As far as digital sound goes, if your LDP had either a coax or toslink digital output then you are good as far as using it on todays equipment. The RF type connector seems to have followed the ldp into history.
 

DaveJ

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,337
1
81
Originally posted by: Muadib
Originally posted by: Shiva112
I know laserdisc could do ac3 audio...but through an RF type connector. I don't know its compatible with today's standard decoders. Not sure of the capacity either, but I know the picture was close to DVD. Others are right though, the compression is the biggest difference between the two. Lack of compression made laserdiscs huge and expensive. Individual discs costed around $80-100.

As far as digital sound goes, if your LDP had either a coax or toslink digital output then you are good as far as using it on todays equipment. The RF type connector seems to have followed the ldp into history.

Actually, that's not true.... laserdisc may use the same TYPE of connector (coax or optical) but the signal is still RF. To decode AC3 from a laserdisc player you need an RF Demodulator, which are fairly hard to find these days... :)

Dave
 

zephyrprime

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2001
7,512
2
81
Yep, LD is analog. As I understand it, the pit lengths are of variable lengths and these lengths encode voltages. Hmmm, now that I think about it, it seems to me that although the color components would be analog, the number of pixels would be discrete (ie digital).

DVD's uses mpg2 compressiong which LD doesn't of course.