Originally posted by: rudeguy
So the stock market could drop to 5,000 and as long as the GDP didn't slip, we wouldn't be in a recession or depression?
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: rudeguy
So the stock market could drop to 5,000 and as long as the GDP didn't slip, we wouldn't be in a recession or depression?
Correct.
Originally posted by: mugs
Depressions have inspirational boxing matches and horse races.
Originally posted by: rudeguy
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: rudeguy
So the stock market could drop to 5,000 and as long as the GDP didn't slip, we wouldn't be in a recession or depression?
Correct.
I think I understand. The stock market crash back in the 30's triggered the depression, it wasn't technically part of it?
Originally posted by: Lurknomore
Originally posted by: mugs
Depressions have inspirational boxing matches and horse races.
:laugh::thumbsup:
Originally posted by: TehMac
Originally posted by: rudeguy
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: rudeguy
So the stock market could drop to 5,000 and as long as the GDP didn't slip, we wouldn't be in a recession or depression?
Correct.
I think I understand. The stock market crash back in the 30's triggered the depression, it wasn't technically part of it?
You're quite right. In fact, there are quite a few Economic historians out there who would contend that the crash of 1929 had almost nothing to do with the depression of the 1930's. They would argue that in fact, the sweeping panics after the crash, along with a failure of the Federal Reserve (i.e. The Federal Government), really led to the crash.
Originally posted by: rudeguy
Originally posted by: TehMac
Originally posted by: rudeguy
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: rudeguy
So the stock market could drop to 5,000 and as long as the GDP didn't slip, we wouldn't be in a recession or depression?
Correct.
I think I understand. The stock market crash back in the 30's triggered the depression, it wasn't technically part of it?
You're quite right. In fact, there are quite a few Economic historians out there who would contend that the crash of 1929 had almost nothing to do with the depression of the 1930's. They would argue that in fact, the sweeping panics after the crash, along with a failure of the Federal Reserve (i.e. The Federal Government), really led to the crash.
That makes sense. Kind of like the media's coverage of all things bad is negatively affecting the stock market now?
One last question. Would a depression trigger deflation (whatever the opposite of inflation is)? Or are those unrelated as well?
