What's faster: Internal or External HD?

JASANITY

Senior member
Dec 10, 2000
504
0
0
I was wondering which one is faster? Are PATA/SATA internal HD's faster than external USB or firewire? OR are external USB or firewire faster than PATA/SATA internal HD's?

Thanks,
Jason
 

ta8689

Golden Member
Feb 5, 2006
1,116
0
0
Internal is gunna be faster there dude. Why would they connect to the sata port when you could hook it up to a USB header on ur mobo if it were faster...duh
 

ta8689

Golden Member
Feb 5, 2006
1,116
0
0
I say inernal. externals nice when your building a few pcs and you have lots to install and its all on that hdd
 

Pariah

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2000
7,357
20
81
External drives are just internal drives put into an external case. If the interface is the same, the performance will be the same. Since this is rarely the case, as most external drives use either USB2 or Firewire 400, external will be slower since the interface is slower standard PATA/SATA.
 

elkinm

Platinum Member
Jun 9, 2001
2,146
0
71
Internal drives are faster, but not by all that much because hard drives are not that much faster.

Benchmarks show that Firewire 400 is faster then USB 2 even though USB 2 has slightly higher bandwidth. Firewire 800 is even faster and should be very close to internal.

And SATA and ATA100/133 are even faster plus they have dedicated optimized controllers so they are and should always be faster.
 

ta8689

Golden Member
Feb 5, 2006
1,116
0
0
I have an asus A8n-sli premium. It has the coolest thing.. sata ports (and a power port) that yo can put in a pci slot in your case. You just run the cables to the mobo and boom... external sata-150. I havent used it, but its pretty neat. Go asus..
 

OSX

Senior member
Feb 9, 2006
662
0
0
You could do that on any mobo. Just take out a slot cover, stick a SATA cable out of it and get a power cable extension. Hell, you could do it with SCSI too.
 

Bobthelost

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,360
0
0
If your real world use is to play MP3s then there isn't much difference, but if it's photoshopping massive files then there is no contest.

Of course with eSATA ports there is no difference, but they're mostly a gimmic at the moment.
 

stardrek

Senior member
Jan 25, 2006
264
0
0
Internal is always faster unless you are talking external SATA, exculding SCSI of course.
 

Susquehannock

Member
Nov 18, 2004
114
0
0
Originally posted by: Pariah
External drives are just internal drives put into an external case. If the interface is the same, the performance will be the same. Since this is rarely the case, as most external drives use either USB2 or Firewire 400, external will be slower since the interface is slower standard PATA/SATA.
That's exactly it. Most externals use internal drives.

PATA & SATA > USB2 & Firewire
 

narutofan36

Platinum Member
Jan 29, 2006
2,823
0
76
internals are much faster


btw, when choosing a external hd, go to firewall connection, when you look at the stats between firewall and usb, you can see usb transfers data at a faster rate but at such fast speeds, files get "clumped together" making it slow down
 

Susquehannock

Member
Nov 18, 2004
114
0
0
Originally posted by: narutofan36
internals are much faster>>>>>>>>
Again, it depends on the interface. You could buy an external case, put an internal drive in it, and use SATA.
In that instance it would perform exactly the same as it would if it was installed internally.

I know because that is exactly what I did. ;)

 

Pariah

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2000
7,357
20
81
Firewire 800 will run just as fast as an internal as well, so the blanket statement that internals are much faster isn't really accurate.

Also, naruto, is firewire, not firewall. The clumped together comment makes not sense either.
 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: Susquehannock
Originally posted by: narutofan36
internals are much faster>>>>>>>>
Again, it depends on the interface. You could buy an external case, put an internal drive in it, and use SATA.
In that instance it would perform exactly the same as it would if it was installed internally.

I know because that is exactly what I did. ;)



Review the original example mentioned by the original posts. And yes, the answer is internal HDD are faster since he is comparing SATA/EIDE/PATA with USB/FW. The original post was crystal clear I dunno why we have to make it complicated.

And for NarutoFan, it's not a "firewall" but firewire! A firewall is for buildings, houses, cars, etc . . . but never for a computer.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
I'm wondering about this too. When you guys say 'much faster' what do you mean by that? It's a pretty subjective statement. I'm currently running one 80gb WD 8mb and am tired of deleting junk off and decided I would get another internal HD. Then I noticed external prices aren't really that bad and I thought maybe I could just use the external as overflow storage so that it would then be portable. I can't think of any reason I would ever need near 80gb if I kept all of my music and such on an external.

If I am mainly going to use the external as a drive to copy to from my internal hd then just how much of a speed difference are we talking about? Something will take 11 minutes instead of 10?
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
240
106
Too many generalizations always lead to the exceptions. I have a SATA drive in an external case connected to the SATA port on the mobo. Why would it perform any differently inside the case than outside?