The problem is, you're being irrational. The sooner you realize that, the better off you'll be.
now remind me why there is a problem? certainly not for lack of finding beef substitutes :Q
The problem is, you're being irrational. The sooner you realize that, the better off you'll be.
Originally posted by: gururu
The problem is, you're being irrational. The sooner you realize that, the better off you'll be.
now remind me why there is a problem? certainly not for lack of finding beef substitutes :Q
The problem is, instead of addressing your irrational fear of beef, you are trying to accomodate it.
Originally posted by: gururu
The problem is, instead of addressing your irrational fear of beef, you are trying to accomodate it.
the only way to address it would be to consume it along with the risk of contracting this disease, not to mention many other diseases associated with red meat intake (heart disease, colon cancer). But that is besides the point, because I'm not preaching to you yet you find it important to preach to me![]()
eh...Originally posted by: gururu
The problem is, instead of addressing your irrational fear of beef, you are trying to accomodate it.
the only way to address it would be to consume it along with the risk of contracting this disease, not to mention many other diseases associated with red meat intake (heart disease, colon cancer). But that is besides the point, because I'm not preaching to you yet you find it important to preach to me![]()
Originally posted by: gururu
The problem is, instead of addressing your irrational fear of beef, you are trying to accomodate it.
the only way to address it would be to consume it along with the risk of contracting this disease, not to mention many other diseases associated with red meat intake (heart disease, colon cancer). But that is besides the point, because I'm not preaching to you yet you find it important to preach to me![]()
You're the one that said it seems silly, so what gives? Is it silly or not?Originally posted by: gururu
The problem is, instead of addressing your irrational fear of beef, you are trying to accomodate it.
the only way to address it would be to consume it along with the risk of contracting this disease, not to mention many other diseases associated with red meat intake (heart disease, colon cancer). But that is besides the point, because I'm not preaching to you yet you find it important to preach to me![]()
The only problem I have with your post is your assertion that you "need" red meat.Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: gururu
The problem is, instead of addressing your irrational fear of beef, you are trying to accomodate it.
the only way to address it would be to consume it along with the risk of contracting this disease, not to mention many other diseases associated with red meat intake (heart disease, colon cancer). But that is besides the point, because I'm not preaching to you yet you find it important to preach to me![]()
you do know if you eat right (yes you need red meat) exercise etc you will be fine? heck if you do all that you well even if you don't you have a better chance of getting hit by lightning then getting MCD?
eat less. its OK! more for me.
/me has 2 strip steaks for today. to bad its raining! bah!
Originally posted by: Eli
The only problem I have with your post is your assertion that you "need" red meat.Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: gururu
The problem is, instead of addressing your irrational fear of beef, you are trying to accomodate it.
the only way to address it would be to consume it along with the risk of contracting this disease, not to mention many other diseases associated with red meat intake (heart disease, colon cancer). But that is besides the point, because I'm not preaching to you yet you find it important to preach to me![]()
you do know if you eat right (yes you need red meat) exercise etc you will be fine? heck if you do all that you well even if you don't you have a better chance of getting hit by lightning then getting MCD?
eat less. its OK! more for me.
/me has 2 strip steaks for today. to bad its raining! bah!
Nonsense.It is entirely possible to get all the lipids and proteins you need from non-animal sources, but it sure as hell isn't going to taste as good.
You do realize that in the US, the odds of being killed during a one mile journey are greater than catching BSE? Eating beef is safer than driving to the store to buy it.Originally posted by: gururu
I've given up beef this last year because of mad cow disease (it only seems silly now!), so what is a good alternative? I've crossed out chicken and fish, but pork ribs will be served. Anyone experiment with grilled buffalo or ostrich?
Agreed. How many human cases of Mad Cow Disease have you actually heard about that've been CONFIRMED that have actually come from United States USDA-approved beef supplies? I sure haven't heard of any.Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: lobadobadingdong
if you cook the beef all the way through you don't have to worry about the mad cow disease, cook your steaks well done, and make sure you have no pink in them same with burgers.
Wrong.
And a complete waste of good meat, too.
Interesting stuff.Originally posted by: gururu
Eli...
statistics concerning the amount of tainted beef in the U.S. are completely unknown because the government has not approved testing of cattle at what I believe to be a reasonable level. The motivations behind the suppression of thorough testing are clear and based on non-scientific support.
From the beginning a lot of misinformation was propagated through the media and though I see no shame in that, particularly because there just wasn't a lot known, it seems that the government and media has done little to correct this misinformation. Lets talk about one of the more serious issues about prions being localized to neuronal tissue. This is not true. Though the brain may be the starting point where infectious prions begin misfolding endogenous prions, it has been found that infectious prions traverse the blood brain barrier and can be found in organs and the periphery. In other words, infectious prions can be in the flesh of the infected animal.
Anyways, until we adopt programs like Japan and England, where larger numbers of cattle, if not all, are tested, welll.... I'll do my best to avoid it.
Anyway, it is absurd to believe that U.S. cows have not experienced this disease. It is out there, and Americans will get it. It may be a very small percentage, but it is certainly a horrible way to go out. Its not like eating E'Coli tainted meat, that will take you out within a day or two. With vBSE, it takes months or even years to die.
