What's better: FarCry or Half Life 2 ?

danklumpp

Senior member
Jul 13, 2005
608
0
0
Of course I'm probably going to get mixed answers here, but I would like to know which one has a better gameplay to it. Which one has the best story line? I know both have superb graphics, so either one there.
 

luigi1

Senior member
Mar 26, 2005
455
0
0
Ya, half life 2 really raised the bar just as hl1 did. Far Cry is a great game but half life 2 really gets you thinking. Graphics are great in both, but far cry added the ability to use folage for cover, I cant even begin to describe what all HL2 added, Its the closest you will come to full interactivy. Its just the best as far as gameplay goes. Too many bases to cover, like you will get involved with these girls, there become so real. Just a lot of levels that this game will hit you with.
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
By the end of HL2 I was definitely eager to pound the daylights out of the main antagonist :evil: and also a certain other person (trying not to spoil this), and felt like all the main characters had a lot of character to them. It was immersive, and the "puzzles" weren't obnoxiously pointless and difficult. I got a little tired of both vehicle sections, though.

FarCry tried for that and really didn't pull it off, but it was still fun to play. :) FarCry is also less linear and forced than HL2, you can roam around more.
 

JustAnAverageGuy

Diamond Member
Aug 1, 2003
9,057
0
76
HL2 has a better story, most of the maps are pretty linear. HL2's multiplayer (CS:S because HL2: DM isnt' great) is far superior.

Far Cry's single player has much more replayability due to the countless way to accomplish the objectives. The story line itself kidna sucked though.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
454
126
I actually feel that HL2 had more replayability, but that's just me. FarCry lost my attention very fast as I didn't like the feel of the movement and aiming. The character felt sluggish for some reason... I can't really explain it. HL2 had a decent story, great graphics, great fun, and of course an expansion pack due out very soon ;). Plus, CSS can't be beat as far as quick pickup online fun.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
61
HL2, like the others say. But if you haven't played Far Cry, I highly recommend it, it's a great, and beautiful, game.
 

NokiaDude

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2002
3,966
0
0
FarCry is a cool eye candy game. The story was pretty lame though. Multiplayer is fun if you get alot of players going cause the maps are HUGE. I like the "feel" of HL2 better. FarCry feels like it's on speed or something.
 

AnyMal

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
15,780
0
76
HL2, no contest

The only thing FarCry got going for it is the eye candy. Everything else like story and voice acting are lame.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
61
Originally posted by: AnyMal
HL2, no contest

The only thing FarCry got going for it is the eye candy. Everything else like story and voice acting are lame.

I wouldn't say that. Gameplay and enemy AI were good too, IMO. As you said, the environments were attractive, but they were also huge. And the size left the player many options and strategies when it came to taking enemies out.

I played on the "realistic" mode and size of the environments came into play a lot during the game. The enemies were tougher and smarter, and the use of the binoc's, a sniper rifle, and night vision became not just helpful, but necessary for survival. Far Cry on realistic mode was the most difficult and fun game I have ever played.

Although, as I said before, HL2 was a better game overall. The atmosphere, the 1984ish feel of the game, was very well presented and played-out. The gravity gun, the combine, physics, and the story and characters made it a better game than FC, IMO.
 

coomar

Banned
Apr 4, 2005
2,431
0
0
hl2 is a great game experience, I remember the white light as you leave ravenhome, I was so shell-shocked by that point, I just ran towards it, farcry is great, large open spaces but hl2 is better
 

Malfeas

Senior member
Apr 27, 2005
829
0
76
I admit I finished Far Cry on the hardest level and it took me two months (DON'T LAUGH AT ME!!!). But I had to cheat on that one level where the woman drives the jeep and you have to shoot everything while bouncing around. That level alone I spent two weeks on, no matter what some damn sniper would get me before I could even see him, so I turned on godmode until I got past that one checkpoint then turned it off. Of course it probably doesn't help that I start to drink when I play a game, so after an hour or so I am pretty drunk.

I haven't played HL2 yet, I can't afford all that beer yet.
 

Slogun

Platinum Member
Jul 4, 2001
2,587
0
0
Far Cry has the best long range draw I've seen, but as folks have said here HL2 is a better game.
If you consider yourself any sort of an avid FPS gamer though, you will play both...
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
Originally posted by: Malfeas
I admit I finished Far Cry on the hardest level and it took me two months (DON'T LAUGH AT ME!!!). But I had to cheat on that one level where the woman drives the jeep and you have to shoot everything while bouncing around. That level alone I spent two weeks on, no matter what some damn sniper would get me before I could even see him, so I turned on godmode until I got past that one checkpoint then turned it off.
The hardest one for me on Realistic difficulty was near the end when I'm trapped in that hallway with the pillars and the hologram displays, because there's no way to retreat and use the divide-&-conquer strategy.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,652
6,219
126
HL2 is better, but Far Cry is definitely worth playing. Especially now that it's $20, a steal.
 

SonicIce

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2004
4,771
0
76
Why not both? :D Farcry 1v1 at a LAN party is so much fun. You like hunt eachother. Steam sucks. CounterStrike: Source is alot of fun. HL2 is very linear but still fun enough to play though twice. The physics are great.
 

BespinReactorShaft

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2004
3,190
0
0
FC has the better overall weapons selection (heaven for long range tactics). There's still no comparison to HL2's gravity gun though.

Difficulty-wise there's nothing quite like FC's monkey trigens and that insane 1-on-1 battle with the attack chopper, but HL2's bestiary has better variety and more consistent fun throughout.
 

dklingen

Member
Sep 24, 2004
127
0
0
The open feel, draw distance, and challenge of Far Cry was better then Half Life 2. I am also not a fan of Steam. Valve seems to want to screw everyone who bought the game at retail. On top of that why didn't Valve discount the game when selling it from their site as a download? I was able to get HL2 at BB for $35 (bronze). Through Steam you get to pay the maximum price possible and that is messed up.