- Sep 20, 2003
- 9,599
- 2
- 0
Originally posted by: NFS4
If you're running WinXP, it already issues aggressive HALT commands
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
vcool.occludo.net
Originally posted by: PorBleemo
Originally posted by: NFS4
If you're running WinXP, it already issues aggressive HALT commands
Really? No worries then I guess...
I read somewhere that someone found out that Athlons have an even deeper power saving state called something like SHTDWN. It shuts off the FSB and parts of the core. Anyone know if this has been implemented into a program for Windows?
Thanks!
-Por
Originally posted by: txxxx
Originally posted by: PorBleemo
Originally posted by: NFS4
If you're running WinXP, it already issues aggressive HALT commands
Really? No worries then I guess...
I read somewhere that someone found out that Athlons have an even deeper power saving state called something like SHTDWN. It shuts off the FSB and parts of the core. Anyone know if this has been implemented into a program for Windows?
Thanks!
-Por
If it shuts off the FSB, then surely its in a standby ?
Originally posted by: PorBleemo
Originally posted by: txxxx
Originally posted by: PorBleemo
Originally posted by: NFS4
If you're running WinXP, it already issues aggressive HALT commands
Really? No worries then I guess...
I read somewhere that someone found out that Athlons have an even deeper power saving state called something like SHTDWN. It shuts off the FSB and parts of the core. Anyone know if this has been implemented into a program for Windows?
Thanks!
-Por
If it shuts off the FSB, then surely its in a standby ?
It does this when the system is idle and somehow reactivates it when there is work to be done.
Originally posted by: Linux23
what is the benefits of using such a program?
Originally posted by: txxxx
Originally posted by: Linux23
what is the benefits of using such a program?
Lower power to cpu = cooler cpu.
