- May 26, 2001
- 984
- 0
- 0
Lets say in this hypothetical situation where Russia, China, or some middle eastern country has sent a nuke heading for your country. Would you rather be in the direct path of the nuke, or would you run and hide in your bomb shelter and hoped that you lived?
I personally, would rather be in the direct path. Assuming that once an ICBM has been launched, countries would send nukes back in retaliation, starting some mass nuclear war. And think, ok, so mabey you do survive in your little bomb shelter, but you may be the only person in 150 miles. Have you really achieved something great? Are you really better than everyone else? considering everyone else is dead. Sure, there might be a few other people that survive, but what good would it be to try and farm on toxic land that has been poisoned and will be poisoned for hundreds of years. Its just my opinion though...
I personally, would rather be in the direct path. Assuming that once an ICBM has been launched, countries would send nukes back in retaliation, starting some mass nuclear war. And think, ok, so mabey you do survive in your little bomb shelter, but you may be the only person in 150 miles. Have you really achieved something great? Are you really better than everyone else? considering everyone else is dead. Sure, there might be a few other people that survive, but what good would it be to try and farm on toxic land that has been poisoned and will be poisoned for hundreds of years. Its just my opinion though...