Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
LOL, no, you have to be critical since your a fucking braindead moron who can't do anything but fall back on a book because you have no real knowledge of your own.
Was that really necessary?
Well that's the great thing about anonymous forums; we can all be team leaders before we're 30.
I don't need to quote books, I don't need to write them, nor be an academic employed by a university. I know a shit-ton more than you and it's proven by your inability to counter my arguments. You're pathetically equipped to debate with me since all you can do is quote and dodge.
I never said I know more than you about Iraq's impact on oil prices. I said Stiglitz and Bilmes know more than you. I would argue they know much, much more about Iraq's impact on oil prices than you since you work in the private sector bank and they hold research-related positions at major universities.
How do you like them apples? (I can quote Good Will Hunting too, do I get a medal?)
No, not really, but when somebody like you sits around saying silly stuff, it gets pretty annoying and ridiculous.
What's great about anonymous forums is that people like you can dismiss people like me by merely saying what you said. People who know me, such as 3cho, know that I am legit.
You didn't need to say you know more than me, you only claimed you read a book which told you what to think. That book may or may not be incorrect, since books have been proved to be incorrect many times. I would argue that they may not know more about Iraq's impact upon oil since they only looked at a few different areas and ignored many others (I did read the book).
I hold a research related position at my bank, BFD.
Sure, you get a sparky medal for only being able to quote stuff, not being able to be original.
It's OK though, not everybody can be so knowledgable in life. Go back to your books while I work in the environment you only read about.